You know, I grew up in a semi-liberal house, and growing my mom always taught me that it was wrong to discriminate, and so, I always used to be pretty liberal about the whole subject, that is until I actually seen 2 men kiss and it honestly, made me physically sick at my stomach, I vomited. I wasn't raised to be predujuice or anything, I never thought I was against it until that point. But I have to say, it's gross, it's against nature, and I don't care what quack says what, I don't believe anyone was born gay. I understand now a days you're supposed to be all politically correct and all that, but I'm sorry, it's gross. However, I'd rather them stay gay, then change their mind and spread disease. I'm against Gay marriage, and these TV shows that show these gays on them, I think they should be outlawed to. It's wrong to discriminate based on race, or disability, but Gay is sick!!!
2006-09-20 16:11:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Tammy C 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
A gay couple should be able to marry, yes. There are a lot of reasons that make encouraging marriage good public policy.
As for marrying a sister, there are, again, public policy reasons why this is bad; primarily having to do with children. If it's a gay marriage to a sister, I'm not sure how much the answer changes.
You can't marry your cat, nor can you have sex with your cat. Your cat can't consent. Leave your cat alone.
By the way, what's traditional marriage? In some traditions, it's for a limited time. In others, it's as many wives, slaves, and cattle as a man can support. In others, it's multiple husbands. The concept of marriage for love is rather recent, basically from victorian times. At it's essence, marriage is a method of property transfer. That's the state's role. The state does not "sanctify" anything. The state does have laws about property, and allowing committed couples to marry is a role of the state that should be available to all adults. (And if it's not available, I want a break in my taxes...why should I pay full taxes if I don't get full citizenship?)
2006-09-20 15:58:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by question_ahoy 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Committed homosexual partners should be able to attain some of the rights of married heterosexual partners, but without calling it a marriage, but rather a civil union. As for the sister, perhaps a civil union would not be so bad there. But as for the cat, you would have a hard time getting the cat to say "I do."
2006-09-20 15:56:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Daniel M 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
you're evaluating apples and Ford Pintos. the two may well be the two crimson or eco-friendly, yet that's the place the similarity ends. The rules in place have no longer something to do with sexual orientation. they are organic gender-based discrimination. A without postpone guy and a without postpone female, of any person age, can get married with out ever having intercourse or ever reproducing. So, it is not approximately having toddlers. A gay guy and a lesbian female can get married, with out ever having intercourse or ever reproducing, so it is not approximately sexual orientation. So, 2 human beings of opposite gender, in spite of sexual orientation can get married for the criminal reward. yet 2 without postpone women, who will in user-friendly terms ever have intercourse with men, who want to get married for the criminal reward and to furnish a competent substantial different and young ones for their destiny toddlers, can't. that's organic gender-based discrimination. Your analogies are mindless. Pets can't enter contractual relationships, and don't have the comparable rights as person human beings. and no-one everywhere is speaking approximately extending the criminal definition of marriage previous that of two consenting adults. So, there is not any slippery slope. the secret's that there are no longer any valid motives to disclaim comparable-intercourse marriage, and no non-non secular grounds to limit gay marriage. and non secular grounds are on no account a valid reason to enact secular rules.
2016-10-15 05:57:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Should blacks be able to marry whites? Why not let them marry children? or marry rocks? Or marry the rocks in your head?
You confabulate consequences that have nothing to do with the wishes of adult homosexuals - already IN committed relationships - to have their relationship legally recognized for rights of inheritance, custodial decisions in case of illness, and visitation in case of hospitalization.
And you deny those rights to preserve the PURITY of an institution that fails at nearly a 50% rate.
Get the queers. Yeah. Stop them. argghhh. Knuckle drag...
Recognize when you are being manipulated for once and use the brain God gave you.
2006-09-20 16:06:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by oohhbother 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
There should be no debate about it. Gays should be allowed to marry. They cannot help that their preference is for the same sex, they were born that way. No people should not be allowed to marry their sister, they can have mentally and physically deformed children. The cat one is SICK.
2006-09-20 16:03:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by older woman 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
I can marry who I choose; if you let me ,right? but as far as I personal think using an exit for an entrance can ,lets say blow out your wheels in a car park. in a restaurant get food all over you ,and a human relationship get mud on your dipstick. As for your sister, why on earth you want to do a thing like that, and for goodness sake leave the cat out of this unless ........Goodness forbid. Just be care full we don't see you on the morning news.
2006-09-20 16:12:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Tiger Woman 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
gays getting married is as bad as someone marrying a cat.
2006-09-20 16:05:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
since all u presented are not acceptable in the real world, but if gays wants to be married and if someone wants to marry his own sister or marry their cat, go ahead. I mean, life has its rules, but u can live without following its rules.
Do you require someone to breath life for you? No.
So there, live it as you want to live it.
We are created to live and have the freedom to live in this world the way we wanted, right? and with this freedom, comes your responsibility. as long as you can be responsible to ur actions, then go ahead and do what u want. Its cool.
2006-09-20 16:03:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by The Punisher 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
You can marry your sister or your cat. You just can't have sex with them because genetically speaking you will have git retard kittens.
2006-09-20 17:43:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by obenypopstar 4
·
0⤊
0⤋