I hear Republicans say that it's the KEY to the war on terror?
shouldn't... oh I don't know... a place that HAS A LONG HISTORY OF ISLAMIC TERRORIST ACTIONS... be the key grounds in the war on terror?
is they why we seem to be having trouble in the war on terror... we go to places that have few terrorist links to fight it?
why do republicans refuse to go on the offensive and take the war to the terrorists?
I've never seen so many people talk about Osama, yet do nothing to find him and do almost everything in their power to focus on something that has little to do with terror...
I find it odd... just me... I would think we would go after the terrorists in the war on terror?
2006-09-20
15:49:16
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
*they should be this... my bad
2006-09-20
15:52:52 ·
update #1
David C: I would say... they have a darn near unlimited supply of footsoldiers... young poor kids that have nothing better to do... but, if we take out the leadership, which clearly is not "coming to us", then you chop off the head of the beast, without having to fight the million different arms of the beast...
2006-09-20
15:58:02 ·
update #2
oh and the longer the "war" goes on... the more U.S. boys will die...
2006-09-20
15:58:54 ·
update #3