Basically Bush is all for the torture of Arab prisoners and detainees.
Despite the facct that REAL WAR HEROS...Republicans like MCCAIN and POWEL...
(none of this BULLSH!T Texas air national guard stuff)
are against torture because they UNDERSTAND what torture is about (after Mccain was tortured)...
BUSH, who has NEVER BEEN IN COMBAT, feels that he wants to REWRITE the rules of war so that terrorists, and suspected terrorists (that could be anyone if you make trouble for the administration).
If Bush gets away with changing the rules, then America would be putting AMERICAN SOLDIERS in danger should they ever be captured.
TRUE WAR VETS know that torture is a bad form of interrogation that only brings "confessions" rather than useful information.
2006-09-20 15:48:19 · 13 answers · asked by ? 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Not having been a TRUE WAR VET, but, a piece of trash with a silver spoon in his mouth, Bush wants to change the laws so that our servicemen will be allowed to freely torture terrorists claiming they aren't covered by Geneva conventions.
#1 HOW MUCH MORE OF THIS PIECE OF TRASH WILL AMERICA HAVE TO SUFFER?
#2 WHERE ARE THE ASSASSIN'S BULLETS WHEN there are WARMONGERS and IDIOTS in GOVERNMENT.
#3 HOW CAN BUSH claim that SADDAM was EVIL for TORTURING IRAQIS, when BUSH is PRO TORTURE?
PRO TURTURE !!!!
I AM SICK AND TIRED OF ALL THESE MUTHERF*CKIN SNAKES IN THE MUTHERF*CKIN GOVERNMENT !
2006-09-20 15:50:32 · update #1
Very true.
I agree with you. He's no better than Saddam.
However, assassination is not the answer, no matter how bad the dude is. We really don't want Cheney in there either. Try him for war crimes. If the laws are amended, I seriously feel that one or more countries will use force against us, right here on our shores. It will most likely come from someone we weren't expecting. It really scares me.
Please leave the National Guard out of this, though. They are the first guys to help out here at home when disaster strikes. They are heroes too. Many of them have been to Iraq. Many of them have died alongside so many others. If it weren't for those National Guard troops, we would have the draft. They are very likely keeping you and I from the frontlines.
2006-09-20 16:02:50 · answer #1 · answered by Schona 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Let's just get this right!!! It was not Bush alone who removed Saddam! He WAS from memory, given some assistance by the "Coalition of the Willing". I really agree that YES!.. he is a two-faced lying bast**d. I don't like what is going on any more than most . It's just every time that Iraq gets a mention , America forgets about us....Come to think of it ... I'll shut up while I'm ahead!
2006-09-21 06:49:20 · answer #2 · answered by renclrk 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Go stick your head in a toilet and flush it.....
Do you forget that there are True War Heros that are National Guardsmen and women serving in Iraq and Afganastan as well as all over the world.....I guess according too dumb@$$ people like you they are not Heros.....Anyone who stands up and fights for his or her countries freedoms is a hero....
I can tell you could never be a hero ...you wouldn't have the balls too get away from your computer too serve.....
Unless you have served SHUT THE F*CK UP!
U.S.Marine
Gulf War I
Semper Fi
You want too learn about real torture....go spend some time in North Korea....Kim Jung II will teach you some real well...
Making someone go with out sleep or keeping them cold or hot or what ever is not torture...and neither is listenign too the chili pepers.....
2006-09-20 22:57:24 · answer #3 · answered by General Custer 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
During the Clinton administration, Democrats redefined the word "fetus" so they could kill babies that are 99% outside the mothers body by jabbing a pair of scissors into the back of the skull. Now they have redefined the word "torture" by comparing cutting off limbs to playing loud music or comparing dropping Kurds feet first into wood chippers to sleeping on the floor.
2006-09-21 15:03:08 · answer #4 · answered by MorgantonNC 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
While I am against the use of torture in all but the most extreme circumstances, I would point out that those interrogated by the CIA are generally in no danger. Those interroged by Sadam's regime, they were on the fast path to the grave.
You do see the difference don't you?
2006-09-20 23:14:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Would Bush have American athletes killed or maimed for not perfoming well in the olympics?
Grow up and realize how lucky you are to live here. You will never know what true torture and oppression are as long as you live in this great land.
2006-09-20 23:01:28 · answer #6 · answered by Martin523 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The tortue Saddam used was to remove body parts like tongues, fingers and toes. How can that be compared to putting someone in a cold room and making him listen to Red Hot Chili Peppers?
2006-09-20 22:56:54 · answer #7 · answered by nighthawk_842003 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hadn't thought of it quite like that but you are right on the money! If we stoop to the ideals of the terrorists,how then are we any better than them?
2006-09-20 22:51:26 · answer #8 · answered by Putt 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
A lying hypocrite if you ask any one outside of this country and more then half that are in this country. Wasn't elected remember he was appointed.
2006-09-20 22:52:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
i think sadaam is better than bush
2006-09-21 05:17:09 · answer #10 · answered by beastmaster2010_1 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋