I think she will be one of the best things to happen to America.
Please explain your answer. I do not appreciate 3 word answers!
2006-09-20 15:31:04 · 17 answers · asked by Scott 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Well, she certainly is a thinker, something threatening and intimidating to the more conservative portion of the population. She is so qualified, but not quite charismatic enough to win over the majority of the population not willing to look beyond the three word soundbite. She realizes that many of the problems of today are complex and require complex solutions.
She engenders such vehement hatred, I cannot see it happening any time soon. That is a real shame for this country. She would make a responsible leader and is a big enough person to include all factions, but I guess it is somewhat of a normal human tendency to take sides and follow like sheep the opinions of political pundits.
2006-09-20 15:46:43 · answer #1 · answered by finaldx 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, too lots conflict of pastime and could have in no way been a possiblity. although, apparently adequate I heard a considerable information venue communicate the different day approximately how the Clintons won in Nevada (observe the plural there - i think of all of us be attentive to hi). the sorrowful component is that if we decide Clinton, then the US could have been governed by purely 2 kinfolk's interior the previous 24 years (in all probability 32 if she could get re-elected). And specific the be conscious governed replaced into intentional there - sounds to me like, um I don;t be attentive to a monarchy? i'm a Huckabee supporter, yet am very very fascinated by the utter loss of any completely compentent applicants on all factors with this election. Mark my words, i'm no Nostradamus or something, however the subsequent 4 years are going to be very diverse than the US or the international has ever seen. we are heading for disaster very rapid and it has no longer something to do with the Bush camp - extremely what is going to be executed after the fact.
2016-10-17 09:03:21 · answer #2 · answered by bergene 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As a lesbian, and a liar, and a Marxist, and someone who has yet to pay for firing civil service workers, this person would put the final nail in the dismantling of our republic.
If the destruction of America from within is your idea of "best things" then I can see how you would invite such destruction.
The problem with the liberal and his/her fondness for socialism/Marxism, is a subtle problem of Clinical_Denial in that the typical liberal delusionally believes that he/she is - of course - to be among the ruling class. This delusional arrogance is almost inherent within the MIND of the typical liberal individual. The clinton duo being the poster children of this affliction.
2006-09-20 15:48:47 · answer #3 · answered by docjp 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hillary already proved what she is capable of when she was president from 1992-2000. Democrats say that we republicans are dumb for supporting President Bush but they would be fooled into voting for hillary. She would be the worst thing to happen to our country since Jimmy Carter. She is a dirty politician and lawyer.
2006-09-20 15:36:58 · answer #4 · answered by de19952 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I'm not real sure we should nominate her to run for the presidency. But,I certainly believe she has the brains to be a good president! Won't it be somethin' to have a president that actually has a brain? We have almost forgottenw hat that's like since Bill left & 'boy-george' took over!
2006-09-20 15:36:45 · answer #5 · answered by Putt 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Do you remember the illegal land deal she and her President husband were charged with? I say if we know she has been charged with illegal actions she has no business being a president.I am sure there are many women who haven't been involved in scandals that would be good in that position.
2006-09-20 15:40:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, she and Bill are both surrounded by scandal. Mysterious deaths seem to happen to people that oppose them or might testify against them.
(Kinda like the enron guy in '02 that died in a "mysterious auto accident".)
2006-09-20 16:29:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I will only vote for Hillary Clinton if she gives me all the food in her fridge.
2006-09-20 15:33:31 · answer #8 · answered by Got pretzels? 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
she is a centrist,, like her husband,, she would be good for America,, she can stomach the right wing conservatives and still make intelligent decisions base on her instincts
2006-09-20 15:51:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If we want to live in a socialist state instead of a republic she's a great choice.
2006-09-20 15:38:12 · answer #10 · answered by midiman77 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋