say, they actually invent an "aphrodisiac" pill----
isn't it weird how it would appear as if we did not have any free will? that we are all just...chemical bags? with a set purpose...
I mean after all, we do not TRUELY decide what we will like or not, it is set up randomly due to our childhood and preset by destinty due to human inherent genetic structure...is it not?
2006-09-20 14:18:35 · 5 answers · asked by jack d 1 in Social Science ➔ Psychology
women were set on a different sexual peak so we would not over-populate and kill ourselves...its all very reasonable and pattern like...
does this not seem like "planned out" to you?
2006-09-20 14:19:31 · update #1
Yes, Marg, its not only the women...I am not doing any sort of accusation. In fact, women get the shaft as well...you see, the men have it early, the women have their peak as of late---but by then men loose interest since their sexual peak has gone down---they are most likely settled already in a family and don't want to be screweing as much as the women...
here the tables are turned...but nature does it for a very PLANNED OUT REASON...and that's to control the population..
I was wondering what would be the outcome if we had like a genetic chip or something attached to our brain that could regulate the "intensity of our sexual urge" ---we would really be choosing in this instance what we like...instead of being the bitches of nature...
just think how much more honest men would be with women after not being so sexually urged to **** them...they could be frank and sex would only happen during meaninful situations..
nature is the perfect totalitarian society, not evcen its
2006-09-20 17:16:18 · update #2
own implementers know of its existance..
we are all under control...whether you like it or not...we must be, in order to preserve our specie's survival and the system...no individual is truelly free from the system.
2006-09-20 17:17:00 · update #3
NO! Women are liberated they turn it on and turn it off. You can master this art and use to greatest ability
2006-09-20 14:28:28 · answer #1 · answered by biglo806 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Get over it. Men and woman vary in sexual desire, though not response, on average. This has been quantified for some time and no amount of social science/humanities BS is going to change that. Do you not think that if it was an arbitrary social construct that you would not see about one half of societies ( or there about ) one way and one half the other? There is much that is variable under the human ambit, but , though it would be real handy if we could fly, echo-late,be haplodiploid, have many matriarchies, levitate and have psionic powers; we do not do much, if any of those things.
2006-09-21 00:10:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Men and women have an equal sex drive. The difference? Women are persecuted and called whores for acting on theirs. This is more of a sociology issue, not biological.
*But ok, yeah, different sexual peaks. We do have that. Well, heck, bilogical time-bombs we are then.
2006-09-20 22:59:17 · answer #3 · answered by hvjhv 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
interesting.
I have found this......I have to prompt the men I am with to have more sex......it has always been the case...a lot of men have said I am over sexed.....I was stimulated early in life so I can not get enough sex as an adult.
your question has a point to it.....but I am able to go with out it if I have to...can the same be said about men?
2006-09-20 21:34:46 · answer #4 · answered by Marg N 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it's planned at all. It's a bit of survival of the species. For those species that had urges that were not good for them, they eventually died off. We continued not because of a plan, but because it worked.
2006-09-20 22:06:07 · answer #5 · answered by nonametomention 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋