2006-09-20 14:16:19 · 22 answers · asked by genny_gump 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Your funny.
2006-09-20 14:20:28 · answer #1 · answered by The Garage Dude 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have also heard the latest rumor that going around about Hillary Clinton sponsoring a bill to name the next Navy Missle Cruiser as the U.S.S. William B. Clinton. There are numerous reports about the number and variety of missles this new war craft might carry. The length of Clinton is also unclear at this time (or a national secret). However, being kind of familiar with Hillary's objectives, I can imagine it is a whopper.
Somewhere on the thirteenth page of special provisions on this mighty, new, battle wagon I seem to recall a paragraph to prohibit the sale and distribution of cigars on board. However, I cannot recall the specification on total seamen he/she/it will carry. My suspicion is that the seamen count will be orally handled for several more months before any final insertion is made.
Whatever the final outcome of this new Naval Vessel proposal is, you can be sure that whatever it is, is going to be an honest and truthful presentation of the revalent facts of the matter as they relate to modern day fighting ship design, and total all weather mission capability. Lest some of those worried parents at home get overly concerned about their sons and daughters serving aboard Clinton, let me say that I strongly doubt that there will ever be a single occurance of blatant non-sexual intercourse onboard this proud symbol of our nation's surging prowess as long as whatever that is is never clearly defined. Oral intercourse is naturaly beyond the scope of these discussions. Various examples of mutual consent are subject to arbitration and judicial rulings on, or below decks, whenever the ship is commissioned and sufficient tongues are wagged about.
2006-09-20 14:54:12 · answer #2 · answered by zahbudar 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ask Laura Bush, notice how close they are getting. We could have the U.S.S George Bush. But with a ship like that you'd have a problem. Most of the sailors would go AWOL to avoid going to Iraq.
2006-09-20 14:21:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Do not worry there was same problem or even worst on HMS BRITANNIA.there were many Queens{DRAG} on it apart from Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II When ever it sailed.My British Friend BOB told me that they were always worried when Prince Charles sailed alone with the crew.
2006-09-20 15:07:36 · answer #4 · answered by Dr.O 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, plus, the ship would not be able to be used unless the French Approved, which would be never. In the event of facing an ememy it could only go in reverse.
2006-09-20 14:20:24 · answer #5 · answered by stick man 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
LOL a Big Blue Boat with White Buffy Clouds LOL All over it. Maybe it could be a Ferry boat.
2006-09-20 14:33:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Remember the quote I DID NOT HAVE SEX WITH THAT WOMAN. Near the end of a 6 month deployment it could be a problem
2006-09-20 14:26:55 · answer #7 · answered by Cherokee indian 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Seamen? As in Men who go out to sea?
Hmm, I don't know, I'll have to look into that...
2006-09-20 14:20:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
2006-09-20 14:18:55 · answer #9 · answered by JEFFAVEGRL 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey! Any 50 year old man who can get a 20 year old to blow them deserves a ship to be named after him.
2006-09-20 14:20:01 · answer #10 · answered by Nathan T 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nope--sailors arent' allowed to wear blue dresses.
2006-09-20 14:25:57 · answer #11 · answered by Cherie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋