theyve only been around a few hundred years.....wtf good are they anyways?
2006-09-20 12:27:21 · 11 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
We are not redefining the geneva convention. It was signed by countries to ensure fair treatment to its POW's and establish basic rules of war. The Islamic terrorists never signed the treaty and are not recognized as a uniformed army. This is why the terrorists are not afforded any special rights because they don't qualify nor deserve any.
2006-09-20 12:35:05 · answer #1 · answered by de19952 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Another liberal repeating the same crap. No one has redefined the Constitution, unless you call make laws out of congress redefining, which is done each and every day. Ever hear of "hate crimes?" Find that one in the Constitution.
The Geneva convention applies to COUNTRIES that signed the accord, it does not apply to terrorists who acknowledge no country. It can only be changed by the signatories in mass. France, Germany, England have all defined what is meant by "Degrading or humiliation" in their laws, you know like calling Bush a dictator or a Nazi - degrading and untrue, so I suppose under the Geneva conventions we can arrest all liberals, right?
2006-09-20 12:36:11 · answer #2 · answered by Colorado 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That's a great question. Isn't it ironic that people that defend the Constitution are called traitors? I love America and it's Constitution. The real traitors and Fascists are the ones that are trying to redefine the Constitution and break our treaties like the Geneva convention, the non-proliferation treaty etc.
2006-09-20 12:53:16 · answer #3 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Name me one of our enemies who lived up to the Geneva Convention. When I was in Nam the VC sure didn't. What about the terriost in Iraq who behead people. Isn't that against the Geneva Convention? Or is only the US suppose to live up to the convention.It is die-hard liberals like you that give our enemies hope.As for the constitution. it has survived many presidents & will contunue to survive .
2006-09-20 12:50:05 · answer #4 · answered by BUTCH 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's a solid facist move. Very similar to Hitler's action in the '30 s. Who would do a thing like that anyway???
2006-09-20 16:17:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why are terrorists supposed to be protected by the Geneva Convention when they do not afford these rights to their victims??
2006-09-20 12:55:34 · answer #6 · answered by Bawney 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Geneva Convention: "You can't insult a person"
Uh, when an "insensitive statement" causes muslims to kill nuns and burn churches, it DOES need to be reworded for these islamic retards
2006-09-20 12:29:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Have you heard? We are trying a new tactic, CorporateFacism to fight IslamoFacism. It's all the rage of K Street.
2006-09-20 12:30:49 · answer #8 · answered by Joe D 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
don't know there are no sources to your question! So what you are saying has no creditability
2006-09-20 12:31:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Leave it alone
2006-09-20 12:33:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋