English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-20 12:04:51 · 9 answers · asked by Michael B 1 in Arts & Humanities Theater & Acting

9 answers

No.

2006-09-20 12:24:33 · answer #1 · answered by Dulcinea 5 · 1 1

The only time it is good is in a musical. A musical director and a theater director. It is OK to have an assistant director for non-musicals, only if they tell their ideas to the Director first, before they give you advice.

2006-09-20 19:45:40 · answer #2 · answered by Kitty L 3 · 0 0

NOT a good idea. Have you ever gone into a video store with a friend, and tried to agree on which film to rent? Imagine that kind of disagreement going on during rehearsals. For an entire MONTH...!

The essential function of a director is to provide the final word on what goes into a production, and what doesn't. Frankly, it isn't a position that wants to be operated by consensus; it's a (benign) dictatorship.

2006-09-21 01:11:39 · answer #3 · answered by shkspr 6 · 0 0

It depends on how well they work together. I know two directors that work together all the time, non-musicals and musicals, and they do an amazing job. But if one or both of the directors become power hungry or get too full of themself then it can be a bad experience.

2006-09-20 20:08:45 · answer #4 · answered by Kim D 3 · 0 0

Well, in our play right now, we have a director, an assisant director, a student director, a choral directior, and choeograpy director. So...that is 5, but the only thing they really have to agree on is who to put in roles, then they are kinda up to whatever they want for their area.

2006-09-20 20:41:13 · answer #5 · answered by hodagwriter 3 · 0 0

From personal experience, I believe it can be confusing for the actors and cause problems. It is nice to have a strong assistant director or stage manager, but you really should have one person in charge.

2006-09-20 23:04:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

bad idea

2006-09-20 19:09:04 · answer #7 · answered by rollo_tomassi423 6 · 0 0

why not? if one has a weakness where the other has a strenght, i don't see why they wouldn't be willing.

2006-09-20 19:57:10 · answer #8 · answered by Eryc 5 · 0 0

if they can come to agreements easily....but certain differences can get in the way

2006-09-20 19:08:21 · answer #9 · answered by her_portrait_in_black 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers