2006-09-20 11:49:04 · 7 answers · asked by confused 3 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
Did someone suggest that those were different theories?
It is really just different aspects of the same phenomenon... a good analogy is a cyllinder. From one direction you see a circle and from another a rectangle. Both the same object, just a different view.
Aloha
2006-09-20 11:52:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
I believe that darkness is a gas and that light is simply the absence of darkness.
Of course, I always liked to be different. If you turn out to be correct, everyone thinks you are a genius. If you go with one of the existing theories, you're just a yes man.
2006-09-20 12:03:04 · answer #2 · answered by god1oak 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Photons theory. Not electromanetic wave.
2006-09-20 11:52:17 · answer #3 · answered by Dr M 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
easy shows the phenomenon of interference, that's achievable in user-friendly terms with waves. on the different hand easy additionally shows the image-electric powered effect, that demands easy to be made out of debris! no longer in user-friendly terms those 2, yet there are a number of different outcomes too, which point out the two in direction of the wave-like, or in direction of the particle-like residences of sunshine. So, what very easy is? Wave or particle? This confusion over particle as against wave residences of sunshine grew to become into resolved with the creation and business enterprise of quantum mechanics interior the 1st 0.5 of the twentieth century, which finally defined wave-particle duality. It supplied a single unified theoretical framework for understand-how that one and all count can behave in the two a wave-like and a particle-like style interior the suitable circumstances. Quantum mechanics holds that each particle in nature, be it a photon, electron or atom, is defined with the aid of a answer to a differential equation, maximum ordinarily, the Schroedinger equation. The suggestions to this equation are time-honored as wave applications, as they are inherently wave-like of their variety. they are able to diffract and intervene, optimum to the wave-like phenomena that are mentioned. yet additionally, the wave applications are interpreted as describing the risk of finding a particle at a given think approximately area. consequently, if one is finding for a particle, one will discover one, with a danger density given with the aid of the sq. of the fee of the wave functionality. So, you will end that we could desire to think approximately the wave factor of sunshine to describe a undeniable team of outcomes, and to think approximately the particle factor as a manner to describe the relax different team of outcomes. the two a variety of components are the two valid.
2016-10-15 05:43:27 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Light is both, a particle and a wave
2006-09-20 11:50:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I accept neither. This all world is an illusion. The matrix has us!
2006-09-20 14:16:05 · answer #6 · answered by I K 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
both are true
2006-09-20 11:52:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋