Tumbling toast, Murphy's Law and the Fundamental Constants
European Journal of Physics 16 172-176 1995
There's a widespread suspicion among the public that toast sliding off a plate or table has a natural tendency to land butter side down, thus providing prima facie evidence for Murphy's Law: "If something can go wrong, it will". Most scientists, in contrast, dismiss such belief as ludicrous. Indeed, an investigation by the BBC-TV science programme Q.E.D. in 1993 claimed to have proved definitively that the whole notion was nothing but an urban myth. However, as I show in the paper, the experiments carried out by the programme were dynamically inappropriate (in that they consisted of people simply tossing buttered bread into the air - hardly common practice around the breakfast table). When the problem of toast sliding off a plate or table is examined more carefully - with the toast modelled as a thin, rigid, rough lamina - it turns out that the public perception is quite correct. Toast does indeed have a natural tendency to land butter side down, essentially because the gravitation torque induced as the toast topples over the edge of the plate/table is insufficient to bring the toast butter-side up again by the time it hits the floor. Note that this has nothing to do with some aerodynamic effect caused by one side being buttered - it is just gravity, plus a bit of friction.However, I go on to show that the tumbling toast phenomenon has far deeper roots than one might expect. If tables were a lot higher - around 3 metres high - the problem of toast landing butter-side down would go away, as the toast would have enough time to complete a full rotation. So why are tables the height they are ? Simple: to be convenient for humans. So why are humans the height they are ? Using a simple chemical bonding model of the human frame, I show that there is a limit to the safe height for bipedal, essentially cylindrical creatures like humans. The limit is around 3 metres - above that height, a simple fall results in gravity accelerating the skull to such a high kinetic energy that the chemical bonds in the skull are ruptured, causing severe fracturing. This limit, in turn, sets a maximum height on tables suitable for creatures with human articulation of about 1.5 metres - which is still not high enough to prevent toast landing butter-side down. It thus seems that human-like organisms are doomed to experience this manifestation of Murphy's Law.
But then comes the real cosmic twist in the tale. The formula giving the maximum height of humans turns out to contain three so-called "fundamental constants of the universe". The first - the electromagnetic fine-structure constant - determines the strength of the chemical bonds in the skull, while the second - the gravitational fine-structure constant - determines the strength of gravity. Finally, the so-called Bohr radius dictates the size of atoms making up the body. The precise values of these three fundamental constants were built into the very design of the universe just moments after the Big Bang. In other words, toast falling off the breakfast table lands butter-side down because the universe is made that way.
Having made this depressing discovery about the nature of our universe, I felt duty-bound to come up with some ways around it. After all, we should not be fatalistic about such things. There are any number of daft ways (eating from 3 metre high tables, eating tiny squares of toast, putting the butter on the underside, tying the toast to a cat, which of course knows how to get right-side up during a fall, etc. etc). The physicist's approach is to minimise the amount of time the toast is exposed to the turning effect of gravity. This means doing the opposite of what you might expect. If your toast is sliding off the table, you should give it a swipe with your hand, to increase its horizontal speed off the table. If you're lucky, it may stay butter side up. If toast is sliding off a plate, you should move the plate rapidly downward and backward, breaking contact with the toast, which then descends butter-side up.
I've since expanded my investigations of Murphy's Law to encompass the question of why there are so many odd socks in our drawers.
2006-09-20 11:29:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
The Discovery TV show MythBusters busted that myth. Toast does not always land face down. I saw this episode over the summer.
This is what I found online:
http://dsc.discovery.com/fansites/mythbusters/episode/00to49/episode_05.html
Episode 28: Is Yawning Contagious?
Using a specially fabricated chamber complete with two-way mirror and a hidden camera, Kari, Scottie and Tory set out to see whether a yawn, like a cold, truly can be caught. Next on the docket: Does toast really fall buttered-side down? Jamie and Adam are on the case, each building a rig to simulate toast being dropped from the dining room table. Finally, the whole team tests the myth that a toy car can beat a real car (in this case, a Dodge Viper) in a gravity slope race.
premiere: March 9, 2005
2006-09-20 20:50:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by andeygirl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No because if you say always that would have to consider the fact that if you intentionally dropped that would fall under the guidelines of always and it will not land "face" down. Assuming you mean that the face would be the buttered side. But the answer is NO! Check mythbusters.
2006-09-20 18:26:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by j-sinn 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The chances of the toast falling, buttered side down, are directly proportional to the cost of the carpet. Its a law.
2006-09-20 18:25:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
apparently the chances on the toast landing butter side down is more likely coz that side weighs more.
& more likely 2 happen on a Monday, when Sods Law is at its strongest.
2006-09-20 18:26:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. It's a myth. It's only more memorable if the butter-side lays down, because it sucks. There's a 50% chance, for either side.
2006-09-20 18:24:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Paul 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
the butter begins to melt on contact, becoming liquefied and, soaking into the bread thus, making the buttered side of the bread, heavier, resulting in a mid air flip.
in other words, yes.
2006-09-20 19:18:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by ny21tb 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
no thats just silly the jelly lands face side up
2006-09-20 19:23:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by nelle 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
only if you've got a freshly clean floor and wish it to stay that way for a while.
or if you've got a filthy floor and you don't like "sprinkles" on your buttered toast.
otherwise, no.
2006-09-20 18:25:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, it is Murphy's Law!
2006-09-20 18:33:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋