Liberal Conservatives must have a view on this plus every clear thinking person in the world.
2006-09-20 10:19:22 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
hardtack, I am grateful for your interjection, maybe you could suggest how I phrase my questions in future, O exceptional one. LoL
2006-09-20 10:40:13 · update #1
Yes, he has...
http://www.rense.com/general57/aale.htm
2006-09-20 10:23:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The answer must be No. If he had, then congress would have already started impeachment proceedings. I haven't read anything in the news about impeachment proceedings, so no criminal act must have been committed. Congress impeaches at the drop of a hat, or zipper, as history has shown us.
2006-09-20 17:22:58 · answer #2 · answered by TechnoRat60 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Doesn't make any difference. Since the same party controls the house, impeachment proceedings can not be started. This gives the executive branch a free license to do what ever they want.
2006-09-20 17:38:58 · answer #3 · answered by tom l 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You can't even put together a proper sentence but you can pass judgment on the Pres?
I not that you don't site sources. The reason Libs have a clear view is because they are the ones that fabricated it. As for your refernece to, "clear thinking people", that's an old leftist plot from the 60s, Get some new material, Jasper.
And learn how to express yourself properly.
2006-09-20 17:23:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Well he did admit to trying cocaine once. That was criminal.And there's the wire tap thing. Though once again, the war is not a crime. It is technically the same war we staged in 1990. Saddam signed a cease fire accord. Then he broke the accord and we went back in. To those who say it is illegal, I say get an education, preferably in recent history.
2006-09-20 17:20:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
yes
1)Stupidity
2)making a deal with the devil(wait a minute he is the devil)
3)Lying and rigging the 00 and 04 election
4)Bad hair and wardrobe
2006-09-20 17:53:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Remember, guilt is decided by the winner, not the loser.
Bush will never be convicted of anything unless we lose the war clearly or unless the senate impeaches him.
2006-09-20 17:22:27 · answer #7 · answered by Chuck N 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Stay tuned......only when this current nonsense is long in the past will we know how it is predominantly remembered.
I really hope history fries his whiney little puppet butt.
2006-09-20 17:21:12 · answer #8 · answered by finaldx 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont think Bush has commited any crime....but we should look into Cheney and the other guy...whats his name again...? Yea yea Rush Limbugh, O'Riley, Sean Hannity and the FOX - I think they are commiting crime on the air - under the name of first amendment and freedom of speech.....
2006-09-20 17:21:39 · answer #9 · answered by Be-hive Baaaby 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Many think he has broken the law several times. Some of these people are on the supreme court.
2006-09-20 17:21:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Stealing elections and lying about the reasons for going to war.
I would say yes.
2006-09-20 17:21:48 · answer #11 · answered by brian2412 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋