american civil war?

Question

from the point of view of nothern or southern soliders at end of the civil war.

Answer 1

Both sides looked to their homes and family after the war. Abraham Lincoln was said to of been too lenient on the southerners by just letting them return to their homes without trial.

But principally, many folks returned to their families to live peaceful lives.

However, on a political standpoint, you have a whole new topic and series of answers!

Answer 2

Well, the south seceded as they thought it their right (and it probably was), but Lincoln decided to take that debate up a notch and let warfare make that decision.

The general population of the South, while glad that the catastrophic was was over, were nonetheless acutely aware of their defeat, not only on the battlefield but of their entire economic structure. Many felt emasculated and bitter.

The North promised every freed black person "forty acres and a mule" and did not follow up on that promise.

Enslaved blacks in the state of Texas did not receive word of the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation until two years afterward, on June 19, and to this day "Juneteenth" as it has come to be known is used as a celebration of that event.


We are still living with the detritus of that gruesome inhumanity (slavery and the sequelae of it) to this day.

Answer 3

Well the North won and the South lost, so the Northern soldiers would have a different view than the Southern soldiers who lost. There are many books on the subject.

Answer 4

The Southerns wanted slavery. The Northerns did not. I love the south, but I hate racism in all its form. Licoln had to make sure that all the hard work America Made to gain this many states was lost. The South just wanted slavery because southerns back then were lazy. So in a time of Crisis Licoln united us and made us an united america.

Answer 5

If the civil war was about slavery, why did slaves still exist in the north after the war?

The civil war was about the rights of states to govern themselves and to be treated equally under federal rule. Instead, the southern states were bearing the brunt of exporting goods and services for the federal government without proper representation. Hence the desire to secede from the union.

Answer 6

Civil War info
http://www.scvcamp469-nbf.com/Q&A/civil_war_wasn.htm

Answer 7

What's the question? The south rebelled and the north had to invade to save the Union. It was that simple. Both sides didn't care fo each other and a lot of resentment still last to this day.

Answer 8

Slavery replaced into the overriding concern. States' rights replaced into smoke and mirrors, an excuse, no longer a reason to insurrection. The South had to evade making slavery their reported reason. It replaced into seen as undesirable P.R. They knew that they could desire help from Europe, in all probability Britain. Many ecu countries could have favored that the U.S. be fractured. States had ceded their authority, whilst they ratified the form. The shape replaced into designed to place the federal authority over the states, because of the fact the unique plan. of a weaker federal government had failed, below the Articles of Confederation. Newspaper articles, from the time of the ratification votes, entreated ratification because of the fact it may preclude states from secession.

Answer 9

What are you people talking about? The North did not invade the South. The South separated from the union leaving union soldiers who were stationed in the south suddenly behind enemy lines. Check your history books, you will find that the South started hostilities by attacking Ft. Sumter.

Answer 10

Southern soldiers: Many left dead. The south in poverty. Southerners then needed to protect themselves as they were not allowed the right to even live.
Some say the country has never fully recovered.