English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I read it on the train home today from college, that a 14 year old will be the youngest person to walk on a catwalk during London Fashion Week, is this morally right, or is she too young?

2006-09-20 09:15:42 · 25 answers · asked by Martin W 2 in News & Events Current Events

25 answers

Not right. A fourteen year-old ought to be preparing for GCSEs and maybe going out with friends at the weekend. She should not be pressured into modelling and the restraint it imposes.

2006-09-20 10:20:57 · answer #1 · answered by MARY W 2 · 0 0

That is amazing; she is only 14 years old. As long as she has a parent there to support and explain any wired stuff, than yes. She should be able to walk the catwalk. I saw a 4 year old (I think that was he age) on the today show doing his thing on the drums and he was playing at a rock concert. The host were like wow, how a kid plays that good at 4. So in others words, kids are excelling in all areas and are displaying their talent every chance they get. Who are we to judge if it morally wrong. I bet not every single person is living free sin life.

2006-09-20 09:49:30 · answer #2 · answered by Bluemoon 1 · 0 0

As long as she has a parent/ guardian with her why should she be disallowed the opportunity, plenty of other kids model, albeit kids lines, and not at the London Fashion Week, but in the grand scheme of things, what is the difference?

2006-09-20 09:19:54 · answer #3 · answered by Louise D 2 · 0 0

perhaps introducing a variety of sized women may well be greater efficient, yet super skinny fashions have vast effect on youthful or easily inspired women - who've low self-well worth or low self image.. and the pubescence female variety/fashions actually have a extensive effect on the nastier men in specific criminal activities, so as that they do have a adverse effect.. those super skinny fashions are no longer a real mirrored image of society the two.. for my area..

2016-10-15 05:33:14 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Of course. Morally, she will have clothes on. Donald Trump's daughter was a model at a young age, and the experience was good for her. Why not?

2006-09-20 10:40:07 · answer #5 · answered by violetmax 3 · 0 0

I would only like to see them only modelling young teenage fashion until they are sixteen. They do makeup fourteen year olds to look over twenty in inappropriate outfits

2006-09-20 12:18:13 · answer #6 · answered by AndyPandy 4 · 0 0

I think its okay. As long as the girl has a responsible chaperone to help guide/ shape her career. Lots of top fashion models have started at that age. As long as she is not wearing anything provocative or risque, I think it will be fine.

2006-09-20 09:19:53 · answer #7 · answered by Bathroom Graffiti 5 · 0 0

She isn't in a porn film, is she?

If this leads to a good career, she will likely make as much money before she is 30 as you will in your lifetime.

She is vulnerable at that age of course, and there are predators out ther. She needs to be looked after, but surely her parents know that?

2006-09-20 09:41:47 · answer #8 · answered by ALAN Q 4 · 0 0

She's old enough to decide for herself.

More to the point, what's wrong with a SOCIETY which wants to put 14 yr olds on a pedestal?

2006-09-20 09:18:56 · answer #9 · answered by Trin 2 · 0 0

It's wrong to make someone as young as that starve themselves to be thin enough to become a model, but if she isn't anorexic looking then it's her choice and if she's happy with it, then good for her.

2006-09-20 09:45:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers