2006-09-20 08:52:52 · 36 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Not just no, but hell no.
The only reason she ran for congress is to try and get to the white house. Shes' two-faced and power mad.
2006-09-20 09:00:47 · answer #1 · answered by Mazz 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
It would depend on who she would be running against, but I would say no. I don't care for her. I don't hate her, but I don't like that she moved to New York to become a Senator. I don't like that she's pandering already. The only plan I've seen her put forth was the government healthcare debacle that almost sank her husband's presidency. When I've seen or heard her speak she comes off as insincere and stiff. So, unless she were running against a bible beating, turn back the clock Republican, she wouldn't get my vote. And even in that case, I might be inclined to vote for a third party candidate over her.
2006-09-20 09:29:16 · answer #2 · answered by ulbud k 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No - but I'd like to explain why. I have no doubt that a woman could do the job. However, given the current state of our "involvement" in the middle east region, I think now is NOT the right time for the U.S. to have a woman president. The cultural beliefs of many of these countries treat women with little or no respect, and I believe that this cultural bias would NOT help us at all as we struggle to regain respect as a nation in these areas.
2006-09-20 09:02:55 · answer #3 · answered by utboat_fanatic 1 · 3⤊ 1⤋
RIght now I am in the mood to vote for anything but Republican...however, if the Dems run Hillary, I may just not vote....I never liked her and I think she can't win.
If the Dems are smart (but who thinks either party is smart?), they would pick a better ticket than Hillary and.... I personally would like to see Mark Warner and Diane Feinstein paired up. Youthfull Mark, who has executive experience and showed he could work with a Republican Legislature in near anti-diluvian Virginia, with Diane, also executive experience, a US Senator and a woman from California. Looks to me they have it on a regional basis, on executive experience, on representing both sexes, neither being a wild-eyed radical, both being rather new blood in the Presidential stakes.
But I expect the Dems will run Hillary and the Repubs will slug it out over McCain and Rudy...and the Dems may just be out of the White House for another 8 years if it boils down this way....
2006-09-20 08:58:02 · answer #4 · answered by William E 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Yes, she did a fine job the 1st time she was president.
2006-09-20 13:47:02 · answer #5 · answered by ragajungle 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hilary is the back bone of Clinton and very intelligent lady but I wouldnt vote for her because Clinton would be in it also. we do need different people . We all have our thoughts and opinions and I am not one who goes on about politics because it is a touchy subject to most.
2006-09-20 09:00:23 · answer #6 · answered by StarShine G 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
not only no but fu*k no! she is in politics just a few years and now she qualified to be president? we would be better off to grab some smuck off the street and give him the job!
2006-09-20 15:37:37 · answer #7 · answered by namkciub 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely
2006-09-20 08:54:41 · answer #8 · answered by Up your Maslow 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Yes, we need change. It would be interesting to see what would happen. I think that most guys are afraid she'd be a better President and then no one would vote for a male President ever again.
2006-09-20 08:55:33 · answer #9 · answered by Kelly M 4 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Undecided
2006-09-20 08:54:53 · answer #10 · answered by momie_2bee 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋