u f o landed on a barren rock and said," OK this will do nicely for our biological dump site."
2006-09-20 08:48:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by territheterribleliar 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
God created the earth
However I would check your facts again
In 10,000BC, Jericho, the oldest known city, was built in the Middle East. Three separate settlements have existed at or near the current location for more than 11,000 years. The position is on an east-west route north of the Dead Sea.
money may have been developed 4500 years ago but archaeologists have not found everything there is to find.
2006-09-20 16:40:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by smartypantsmbcanada 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Here is the deal with scientific "facts".. A couple of months ago it was a "fact" that our solar system held nine planets. Then one day they claimed it had twelve, and then they changed it a few days later. Facts are not absolute, they are relative to the particular scientist who discovers them (and the needs and wants of the people who fund those scientists).
Also, if you have seen the movie An Inconvenient Truth, you will see how fast ice, earth, temperature, etc. change. Don't put too much weight into any one theory or "fact".
2006-09-28 07:35:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by sixgun 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
These are random things that seem to have no relation to each other. This is a completely circumstantial list of things. You could get another list of things that could be around 1000 years old, or 10,000 years old. It doesn't mean anything "happened" at that time. Only when a significant amount of similar events happen can you effectively ask "what happened at this time on earth". A good example is that a lot of dinosaurs appear to have gone extinct at the same time (65 Millions years ago). This would be a case where it is intelligent to ask "what happened?"
2006-09-20 16:06:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Take it from Toby 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
These are just approximate values and, at the most, coincedences.
Ice Age ended about 10,000 years ago with flooding and stuff like that following. This is a much more important number for our planet than 4,500 years ago.
Although, I must say that if your numbers are correct it's an interesting point you are making.
2006-09-20 15:58:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by T F 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Probably a lot of geological changes that made dissapear a lot of prior evidence and fossils making it harder to find something older.
2006-09-25 17:10:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by johannsinuhe 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It doesn't meean any thing to me. It's all very ramdom
2006-09-23 09:18:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋