Contract between Landlord and roommate....they both signed to have her evacuate as of 9/30/06?

Question

Both parties signed. no lease prior to this, landlord wanted roommate out, they both signed contract. I just dont think it's legal, no witnesses...

Answer 1

Even without witnesses, it is still a signed contract, and binding

Answer 2

There do not have to be witnesses to a contract like this. If there was a lease signed, there may be a mandatory notice period (i.e., the landlord may have to give 30 days' or 60 days' notice prior to the first day of the calendar month when the vacation is to take place - so, for example, for a 30 day notice the roommate might have to have received the notice, on or prior to 8/31/06).

Otherwise, it is a binding contract.

Answer 3

Because it was a consensual agreement between both parties and is recorded in writing as well as signed by both parties, this should stand as a legitimate legally binding contract. An opposing party could try to contest it in a court of law, but that would be futile. An agreement was made; thirty days and they're gone.

Answer 4

It is a signed contract....even if there are no witnesses....not every contract needs a witnes. I don't know about not having a lease....with a lease there is an agreement to give notice but not having an agreement I don't even know if notice has to be given....For future referance always have a lease or rentors agreement...this will protect both the landlord and the rentor....

Answer 5

When ever you sign an agreement, if you are an adult and legally allowed to sign an agreement/contract, its binding! Have a friend (adult/lawer) read what has been signed or better yet call one of the local free leagal advice hot lines. Good Luck!

Answer 6

You don't need witnesses for a contract to be valid. FYI - a contract can be oral.