English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Considering there are always 50% women and 50% men. And of the new generations are born, it's always 50% women and 50% men.

2006-09-20 06:16:34 · 9 answers · asked by Fallen_Anjel 2 in Science & Mathematics Other - Science

9 answers

its should cut the worlds population by at least half in one generation

2006-09-20 06:19:01 · answer #1 · answered by vanman8u 5 · 0 0

The world population would decrease dramatically.

In order for the population to remain stable, each woman would need to have 2 kids (replacing herself and her mate). If a woman only had 1 child, after she and her mate died, there would be a half replacement.

Also consider that there are more women than men in the world. Statistically, there is 3/4 chance of having a baby girl versus 1/4 chance of having a baby boy. If a woman only has one child, chances are that she will have a girl. If every woman only had 1 kid, the population would become very unbalanced - there would be a lot more women than men - statistically (biologically as well), there would no longer be a 50-50 split between the sexes.

2006-09-20 13:30:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Actually, the population is naturally about 52 percent female and 48 percent male. 98-99 percent of the population is straight only.
So with those statistics in mind and the fact that the world is overpopulated to begin, I would venture to speculate that we would half our growth in twenty years. Personally, I am in favour of a two-child policy in India, Nigeria, South Africa, Brazil, the United States, Japan, the Phillippines, Jamaica and other overcrowded countries with a lot of poverty.

2006-09-20 13:20:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Not only would it halve the population, but it would radically shift the demographics; there would be a much higher percentage of older people, with all the younger folks being worked half to death.

Speaking as a retired person, myself, I rather like the idea.

2006-09-20 13:25:36 · answer #4 · answered by silvercomet 6 · 0 0

U are wrong because u have to consider the muslims whereby the male are allowed to have 4 wives at one time.

2006-09-20 13:20:16 · answer #5 · answered by Scouser7674 4 · 0 0

It may reduce the world population.

2006-09-20 13:19:54 · answer #6 · answered by abdirashid A 1 · 0 0

Well I would definetely curb the overpopulation problem we are going to start having in the years to come.

2006-09-20 13:19:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It would cut it in half every generation...

2006-09-20 13:21:00 · answer #8 · answered by Andy FF1,2,CrTr,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 5 · 0 0

it would halve every generation

2006-09-20 13:29:02 · answer #9 · answered by ArgumentativeButNotInsulting 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers