2006-09-20 05:46:17 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I forgot to mention that I am interested primarily in your reasons for opposing the decisions.
2006-09-20 05:47:57 · update #1
Forcing public libraries and schools to allow porn access in the name of free speech.
When are we going to give our children some rights to be protected?
2006-09-20 06:16:15 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There's just 1 that REALLY bothers me.That's the one where they stopped the vote count BEFORE all the votes were counted in the 2000 Presidential election.This was justice Scalia's decision.In doing so, he usurped the constitution,& the rights of everyone in the United States of America.I don't care how long it would've taken, or who would have won,you respect the rights of those who voted.
Funny thing: Scalia and Dick Cheyney are hunting buddies,but he didn't get shot at.
2006-09-20 06:01:44 · answer #2 · answered by frith25 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Lochner v. New York
As Justice Holmes said, "The Fourteenth Amendment does not enact Mr. Herbert Spencer's Social Statics."
There is much less content than structure in the Constitution. Substantive due process was wrong when it barred states from enacting minimum wage laws, and it's wrong now.
2006-09-20 06:14:56 · answer #3 · answered by Nate 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The one that stopped the recount in Florida in 2000.
2006-09-20 05:47:42 · answer #4 · answered by courage 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I detest Roe V Wade
It legalized murder
It turned doctors into murderers
2006-09-20 05:53:50 · answer #5 · answered by mike c 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
this is not the place or time to make such comments that might be a problem to those who improperly answer their real beliefs here. put it this way, look at the justices and their roots!
2006-09-20 05:53:18 · answer #6 · answered by cadaholic 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The eminent domain one.
2006-09-20 05:47:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
it is not wise to comment
2006-09-20 05:49:20 · answer #8 · answered by apurba s 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋