move the Fing UN out of the USa, then we can get the USA out of the UN. Let Chavez and his Iranian boyfriend pay our share of the bills and see how much smack they throw around then.
2006-09-20 05:45:14 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Move them drunken bums to Darfur, I bet it takes them an hour or less to solve the problem. Don't even buld a new building, just make them meet in the newest hellhole they waffle over.
2006-09-20 08:29:47 · answer #1 · answered by utahraptor88 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Harry P Ness - lmao btw!! During Veit Nam the "peace talks" were held in a swank hotel in Paris. It took 11 months just to decide on the shape of the table! Meanwhile, on both side, kids were being killed. Eleven months to decide a shape for the "bargaining" table!! Absurd! Criminal! I feel if the UN were moved to a different, less secure, country perhaps the "delegates" (and I use that term in it's broadest application!) would have a change of heart and things would be solved much quicker. I know, I know, it's hard to keep your mind on draining the swamp when you're up to your a*s in alligators, but that's why they get the big bucks!! Fear, real or imagined, IS a motivator.
2006-09-20 06:01:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Naw it is best that we keep control of it. Where else can these leaders feel safe. I mean would you feel safe going to the UN if it was in Iran? Seems that a lot of leaders would be killed as their air planes landed. And I'm sure the Iran leader would arrive late just a little after some one blew up the building. Naw it is better to keep it here.
2006-09-20 05:50:25 · answer #3 · answered by Don K 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋