In other words, give the Bush family royalty rights in the US?
2006-09-20 05:32:15 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Uh, that IS what happened 6 years ago, as I recall. His brother, Jeb, is next in line to the throne. Print this out and save it in your wallet, and take it out in 2 years and 2 months.
2006-09-20 22:23:30 · answer #1 · answered by correrafan 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Isn't voting to abolish elections some kind of paradox? Besides, we have elections and the Bush family already seemingly has "royalty rights" in the US.
2006-09-20 16:01:56 · answer #2 · answered by ulbud k 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO! They have too much power now! Why give them more? Bush's family has money. His brother is governeor of Fla. They have stocks in oil and I'm not sure what else. That's all we need is to give them sovereignty!
2006-09-20 12:40:34 · answer #3 · answered by helpme1 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wish he was never elected president, much the less to give him more power. I'm not in favor of a monarchy anyway; I like Clinton, but I don't want him to be king.
2006-09-20 12:41:09 · answer #4 · answered by robert2020 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
May G-d save us all. I think it's what Bush would like to do.
2006-09-20 15:07:21 · answer #5 · answered by Damon 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes of course. bush might be a little wacky but id say the democratic choice is ten times more of a wackjob.
2006-09-20 12:39:47 · answer #6 · answered by california gurlie poo 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Nope.
2006-09-20 12:39:26 · answer #7 · answered by kearneyconsulting 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
HELL NO. I would gouge out my eye with a spork before I do that.
2006-09-20 12:39:49 · answer #8 · answered by willow oak 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no to your question but most likely yes to waynekris question - lots of morons out there
2006-09-20 12:39:56 · answer #9 · answered by Adam P 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not only NO but HELL NO
2006-09-20 18:07:23 · answer #10 · answered by micheleh29 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋