That's tough because both opponents have good defenses. I'd go with Chad Pennington because Buffalo isn't going to let the Jets run and he'll be throwing lots of passes. Hopefully that will result in something good for you. Denver has a terrible offense, so New England will probably just run the ball once they get a lead and Brady won't be racking up fantasy points.
2006-09-20 05:13:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by James L 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Start Pennington. NE has no receivers, and Denver will put Champ Bailey on whoever is deemed the No.1 for NE (probably Chad Jackson). Buffalo lost Troy Vincent, so leaves Nate Clements and Terrence Mcgee and rookies. CP will throw to all of his receivers. Just look at what he's done in the last two games!
2006-09-20 05:11:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is very difficult. I would start Tom Brady even though there is a good possibility that he won't play good since the Denver defense has not given up a TD or penalty all year yet. Denver also has a secondary far better than Brady's receivers. Yet Brady is at home, and is always a safe bet to not hurt your team too much.
Pennington also has to play a stout defense in Buffalo who dominated Culpepper last week. He has a chance to produce bigger numbers but he also has a chance to produce negative numbers.
2006-09-20 05:10:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by ludacristic 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
go with Pennington, with the Patriots having two quality runing backs Dillon and Moroney, they have little need to throw unless they are down but the way denver is playing this year its unlikley. Pennington has two great recievers in cotchry and Coles they have no running game so expect Pennington to throw it alot agianst the Buffalo D.
2006-09-20 05:14:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You have to go with Brady. He has Chad Jackson now so he should post better numbers. I don't trust Pennington yet.
2006-09-20 05:14:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Drunk365 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Narrow edge to Pennington.
Yes, he's a scary injury risk. Still, he's got some good WRs, and they can't run the ball a lick. They'll have to throw to win.
Brady has Ben Watson, and not much else. Later in the season, if Jackson and Gabriel come to fruition, maybe rethink that. For now, you're smart to bench Brady. That Denver game should be low scoring, courtesy of Champ Bailey.
2006-09-20 06:46:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Kolb will initiate ever week till he's harm. Reid positioned all his chips on Kolb whilst he traded McNabb and there is not any way he is going to alter. Vick confirmed today that he's able to transforming into a distinction and that he may well be a commencing QB lower back yet all meaning is that possibly Philly can commerce him and easily get some thing in return. i grow to be in no way a Kolb fan and in no way understood why everyone grow to be so extreme on a guy with 2 starts off ( a million against KC). He ought to be solid, yet under no circumstances did i think of he would be powerful as a starter.
2016-12-18 13:45:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am in the exact same boat with my starting QBs and I think I am going to start Pennington. NE can count on the ground game with Dillon and Maroney. The Jets have to go through the air.
2006-09-22 09:53:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Tim M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd start Brady, only because they're at home. Buffalo's defense looks pretty tough, too (but it's early).
2006-09-20 08:03:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
chad pennington all day long and twice on sunday
2006-09-20 05:14:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by mr e 4
·
0⤊
0⤋