2006-09-20 04:09:54 · 37 answers · asked by Cassandra 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
clinton
2006-09-20 04:10:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bill Clinton
2006-09-20 04:27:21 · answer #2 · answered by peaceman 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Putting aside party affiliations and basing my decision on the job each has done...they both have done some good things and some bad things but.....
Bill Clinton was one hell of a president.
you see...i really don't care about parties...i'm a registered democrat just to be registered as something...but i voted for bush...i vote for the man i believe can do the job the best...and in my opinion Clinton handled the presidency very well...despite the stupid monica thing he did good things for our country and he did'n take any sh*t. the same goes for Bush really...our economy sucks with him in office but at least he doesn't take any sh*t..like lets say someone like Jimmy Carter did.
Bill Clinton is the most perfect example of the american dream...
an orphan who grew up in a dysfunctional family from arkansas who became the president of the united states!!
you can't get better than that people.
2006-09-20 04:21:01 · answer #3 · answered by chefzilla65 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hillary Clinton
2006-09-20 04:14:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Clinton
2006-09-20 04:11:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Clinton
2006-09-20 04:10:54 · answer #6 · answered by Bistro 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Clinton!
2006-09-20 05:28:49 · answer #7 · answered by Lee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
George Bush because if 9/11 would have happen with Bill in office he wouldn't have done anything, except maybe give them some nukes so they could do a better job next time.
2006-09-20 04:36:08 · answer #8 · answered by Sean 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on what they are running for.
Neither Clinton or Bush will be president of the United States again, so the answer to the question would depend on what office they sought.
Bush and Clinton have both been governors of Texas and Arkansas respectively. They could run for those seats again.
Either would make pretty good congressmen.
Which would I vote for?
It would depend totally on what office they sought. Neither of them would make good dog catchers, coroners or district attorneys. They would probably be sorry school board members, overpowering as mayors and city council members.
The fact is, after you have been President of the United States, no one would probably vote for either of them for anything smaller. They would be "over qualified."
2006-09-20 04:16:09 · answer #9 · answered by Bruce Frazier 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush, It is easy to love Clinton because he never did anything. When Bush came is he had a hell of a mess on his hands. 911 was the result of 20 years of inaction on the part of the US, Bush is working on rectifying it.
2006-09-20 04:21:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bill Clinton.
Better a balanced budget and a bj than a historic deficit and getting screwed over.
Plus if Clinton pulled the Iraq sham he'd be impeached by now.
2006-09-20 04:11:49 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋