Iam not a raving conspiracy lunatic. I only know that there are lies. Where there are lies, there has to be a cover up of some kind.
Never in the HISTORY of the world has a steel framed structure collapsed due to fire. Even fires that were raging for 10 hours. And we are expected to believe, that not one, not two, but three buildings collapsed at free fall speed on the same day! Building 7 was not even hit, and had zero reason to collapse. And since so many people were recorded (including the firefighters and newpeople) saying that they heard explosions, several explosions, why werent the ruins at least investigated?? All of it was immediately carted away on a barge to China before any investigation could be done. Even for the purpose of studying it should have been investigated. every little plane crash, each shred of the plane is gathered and studied. Here we have 3 giant buildings taken down, and all the evidence is whisked away?
2006-09-20
02:07:16
·
16 answers
·
asked by
Coco
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
Here's what's REALLY going on with 9/11!...
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/911/Robert.htm
2006-09-20 08:05:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
As an ex aircraft mechanic, the first thing you must know is that the amount of actual steel in an aircraft is minimal. The primary metal used, much like cars, is aluminum. They use this very light metal because of it's weight. Aluminum will melt at a lower temperature than steel. One last note is that the only part of an aircraft composed of heavier metals would be the landing gear and the supports used to attach them to the body. Now if you take an aircraft moving at around 200 mph with a wingspan of 156 ft 1 in. from tip to tip. 176 ft nose to tail and 52 ft tall. Take on the weight they were carrying that day and the fact that the wings themselves are nothing but extremely flammable fuel.
With that being said and for anyone who watched the plane slice through you would've noticed the enormous hole it made and the floors it severed. People are still claiming fraud. Explosions, OK genius, if you take a container the size of the wing close it off except for a hole allowing the vapors to escape and light it, you will get an explosion. The wings are split up into multiple tanks, this allows them to control fuel flow and better manage the jet fuel while in flight. So one blows, a little while later another, and so on. Don't talk about what you obviously know so little about.
2006-09-20 03:22:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here is what one aircrash investigator of 30 years experience has to say about vanishing airplanes.
http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson.htm
“In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. This is because every military and civilian passenger-carrying aircraft have many parts that are identified for safety of flight. That is, if any of the parts were to fail at any time during a flight, the failure would likely result in the catastrophic loss of aircraft and passengers. Consequently, these parts are individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked by a records section of the maintenance operation and by another section called plans and scheduling.”
“The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. The hard evidence would have included hundreds of critical time-change aircraft items (with serial numbers) plus security videotapes that were confiscated by the FBI immediately following each tragic episode”
2006-09-20 02:22:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by axeldones 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The planes hit the towers..extreme heat weakened the support structure and the towers fell.
I don't need to explain anything because thats what happened and everyone for miles and millions watching TV saw it.
What you need to explain is how they got all the explosives inside the buildings and no one saw it.
How did they place shape charges and no evidence of the preparation.
How did they ignite the explosives without primer cord (carefull now...it's tricky..timing of the charges and reliability issues).
You cant just say they blew it up and no one ask how and want details....no...i think the burden of proof is on the accuser.
2006-09-20 02:17:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dave 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The fact that you use the word "except" instead of "accept" tell us everything we need to know about you.
True, fire alone has not collapsed steel buildings. However, never before has a fully loaded 757 flown into a building and destroyed 25% of the load bearing structure.
I pity you that nobody taught you critical thinking skills. The education system has failed you. Please take the time and effort to educate yourself. It will make your life much more enjoyable and successful.
2006-09-20 02:21:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Aegis of Freedom 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Many UFOs were seen just before 9/11.
These were commanded by space aliens and Bigfoot.
Bush knew Bigfoot was in town, but he kept quiet about it.
BUT, some Liberals are now saying that 9/11 never happened. It is just an illusion that is still going on.
2006-09-20 02:14:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The practically full tanks of Jet fuel burned so hot that it melted enough steel structure to cause floors to fall on each other, and therefore the collapse.
2006-09-20 02:21:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Rudy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
At this point and faced with the documented evidence
OF:
THERMATE
BOMBS GOING OFF EVERYWHERE
FREEFALL INTO FOOTPRINT
DETONATION SQUIBS
SMOLDERING POOLS OF MOLTEN STEEL FOR WEEKS
KRONGARD INSIDER TRADING ('PUTS' ON UNITED AND AMERICAN)
BLATENT BLDG 7 DEMO-IMPLOSION
SILVERSTEIN'S "PULL IT"
PEOPLE WARNED NOT TO FLY
PROVEN FAKE OBL TAPES
7 OF 19 ALIVE
NO ARABS ON ANY FLIGHT MANIFESTS
NORAD STAND DOWN ORDER
CNN REPORT OF "NO PLANE AT PENTAGON"
RUMSFELD ADMITTING A MISSILE HIT THE PENTAGON
RUMSFELD ADMITTING FLT 93 WAS SHOT DOWN
MULTIPLE SIMULTANEOUS WARGAMES ON 9-11 OF THE EXACT SCENERIO
FEMA'S ARRIVAL TO LOWER MANHATTAN ON SEPT.10TH
PNAC'S PUBLISHED NEED FOR A "NEW PEARL HARBOR"
SS NOT REACTING TO GOAT READING CHIMP TARGET
OPERATION NORTHWOODS
THE DOWNING STREET MEMO
BUSH'S DIARY ENTRY 'NEW PEARL HARBOR'
ANYONE STILL CLINGING TO THE BUSHCO ISSUED FAIRYTALE IS EITHER A DOWN SYNDROME VICTIM OR SOMEONE WHO WOULD FOLLOW BUSH'S LIES TO THEIR GRAVE.
THERE'S NO MORE DEBATING
THAT'S THE END OF THIS STORY
2006-09-20 02:09:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by mikeygonebad 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
there are some very serious questions. much more serious then those you have mentioned. there are literally hundreds.
your government is not acknowledging these questions and seeking to provide answers.
yet your people are overzealous in jumping to conclusions
we must maintain a balanced approach with the lack of facts we have now.
2006-09-20 03:35:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Piffle 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Steel is a molten liquid at one point in its creation - so it is reasonable to accept that at very high temperatures it will once again become a liquid. Obviously your high school classes were ignored.
2006-09-20 02:34:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Faith White 2
·
0⤊
0⤋