English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It seems to me that Rockstar was fine until he injected his typical "Survivor" type junk. In the words of Joe Perry "Let the music do the talking!"

He had to add controversy and not leave well enough alone. I didn't have to live in the house to be able to tell that Lukas was probably an ****. Instead they had to paint Dilana-the obvious frontrunner (who should have won) as a witch.

I, for one, have no plans to spend a penny on anything Supernova makes!

2006-09-20 01:02:19 · 4 answers · asked by Bjorn Loser 1 in Entertainment & Music Music

4 answers

There were a lot of problems with this edition of Rockstar Here are my top 3:

1) Anybody who knows music knows that Dilana was not the right fit for that band. She is Courtney Love - and Courtney Love is grunge - not Supernova's fit.

2) We never enough of the members of Supernova play as a group.

3) On Rockstar: Inxs, we saw some "magical" performances. Including the great original stuff by Marty Casey ("Trees") and JD Fortune ("Pretty Vegas"). We never saw anything come close like that. That is because this was a weaker crop of contestants.

But I can't buy a concert ticket for a group that hasn't performed together yet. Hey remember when Gary Cherone joined Van Halen - how bad it turned out? The proof is in the pudding.

2006-09-23 03:36:43 · answer #1 · answered by L.A. Scene 3 · 0 0

Oh man, you're right. Not only this, some of the songs on the show are dissapointing. I was hoping for sometihng more rock n roll, more heavy.

2006-09-20 01:07:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yeah,, i hate that lucas from the start! i prefer dilana, coz she's got great voice!!!

2006-09-20 01:12:45 · answer #3 · answered by ANDI앤디ANDI앤디ANDI앤디 2 · 0 0

I totally agree!

2006-09-20 01:04:12 · answer #4 · answered by GirlsRGamers2 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers