The facts are that NONE of this Bush family (George, Laura or the Twin Females--whatever their names are) has ever been shown in the news media holding, petting, playing with or in any other acceptable manner relating to a cat or a group of cats!
(The Clintons [Arugh!] at least had Socks as you may recall, even though he, like Buddy the dog, may also have only been window-dressing for that tribe of miscreats and is now dead, the result of an "accident" after no longer being needed for a "humanization" ploy for the public's "benefit".)
In any case--since not one of the Bushes currently associated with the White House is known to have any affection for cats, it can be assumed that there is a real possibility that one or more of them hates cats and may even mistreat cats when not in the public view!
FOR EXAMPLE, for all we know George may kick cats (AW!!)--whirl them around by their tails in the air (GASP!!)--or play mean mind-games with them (BOO!!)
SO, REMOVE W--YES OR NO??
2006-09-19 23:48:31 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
people have gotten really frustrated with this one.. and it will take this Nation along time to come out of this and heal
2006-09-20 00:04:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
In the 1930s, Lili Riefenstahl made a Nazi propaganda movie called "Triumph of the Will".
There is a scene which shows Hitler in a motorcade, looking up and to the left. The next shot shows an upstairs window in which there is a cat looking out. These two shots were placed together at a later time to give the impression that Hitler was looking up at a cat and that he liked cats.
Maybe you are right about Socks.
2006-09-20 00:04:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I actually love and appreciate this placed up. that's because of the fact i've got self belief no could desire to even grant any "truthiness" right here. It speaks loud and sparkling for itself. Plus i've got self belief that any information i ought to offer to counter this argument will meet many brick partitions. Many have already supplied suitable responses, so i'm going to circulate away it at that. i'm a liberal and that i do no longer hate republicans, nor do I hate Bush. My fiance is a soldier who has been on 2 wrestle excursions in this "freedom spreading conflict on terrorism." yet, i think of it is so unhappy that his presidency has introduced this variety of empty rhetoric out into the open guised as "patriotism." P.S. All politicians are liars - that's in simple terms referred to as being a flesh presser.
2016-10-15 05:10:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only reason the Clintons had a cat was because the whole family was attracted to kitty litter boxes.
2006-09-20 00:23:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I guess you did not see the White House Christmas Special (which the Democrets hated ) where their dog roamed the White House looking for their cat that was curled up in the oval office.
2006-09-19 23:59:19 · answer #5 · answered by BUTCH 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No,that' stupid.The Cintons only had Socks around because Bill wanted to be surrounded by pussey(cats)
2006-09-19 23:53:31 · answer #6 · answered by joecseko 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
He should be removed from office anyways hes an up himself prat!
2006-09-19 23:58:57 · answer #7 · answered by rainbow 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I say swing him around by his tail until his eyeballs pop out.
2006-09-19 23:59:24 · answer #8 · answered by Preacher 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They dont need cats because they are already Pu**ies!
2006-09-19 23:57:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I get it and I think it's funny. And so does my cat.
2006-09-20 01:13:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋