2006-09-19 23:21:49 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
All of you bleeding heart liberals who state that executing a criminal is wrong have never had something bad happen to your or a loved one or a friend. Here's a question, say your 16 year old daughter is raped and beaten. The rapist gets caught and because he pistol whipped her, sodomozied her, mutulated her, etc. Now, what would your take on execution be?
As for the answer to the question, criminals should be executed by lethal injection, its faster.
2006-09-20 02:27:16 · answer #1 · answered by kknight723 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am not up for executing anybody, period. I think that people ought to be tought about the consequences of their actions.. until society is really in a position to guarrantee that it has done its best to raise its members with honor and dignity and ethics, then society should take some of the blame for the crimes committed by its members.. as for the criminals posing a future threat, nowadays there is technology to monitor their seclusion and they don't even have to built jails and prisons anymore.. however I think that leaders are far from being genuinely interested in ending the disgrace that is happening in each and every prison in any part of this world
2006-09-20 06:53:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Assuming you and your state support execution, I would think the most humane method is best, such as lethal injection, because we are not executions, so the only purpose in execution would be to eliminate the possibility of future crimes by this person.
2006-09-20 06:31:07 · answer #3 · answered by Katyana 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Lethal injection. The person is paying the ultimate price....death. That is the purpose of the death penalty...not revenge. You do not have to cause immense pain in order to execute someone.
2006-09-20 06:35:03 · answer #4 · answered by First Lady 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I support the death penality. I think that we should give the criminal a choice:
1. Lethal injection
2. Firing Squad
3. Electric Chair
4. Hanging
All have their pros/cons, but let them choose the manner of their death. I would have put the guilotine up as well, but the mess.......
2006-09-20 07:49:53 · answer #5 · answered by Charles B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not a sadist or anything, but I would say execution by guillotine. It's quick and virtually painless for the criminal.
2006-09-20 06:30:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
criminals shouldn't be executed. We can't have the right to say who lives and who dies. Because, we are no different from them.
Just that we usually never know it.
2006-09-20 06:35:01 · answer #7 · answered by Cass 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
killing human being for criminal act has to be banned. why u are so cruel to find a answer for a gruesome punishment.
2006-09-20 07:03:25 · answer #8 · answered by Master 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Forgive him once
if he still does not give up his deed, Do to him what he did to you....so that he understands and will never repeat
2006-09-20 06:29:30 · answer #9 · answered by Jesus Loves even Osama 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Crucify him, and let Barrabas go free.
2006-09-20 07:01:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋