Not much difference there - one uses war to get oil and the other uses scare tactics but targets specific areas to attack. The other attacks under the guise of "protecting" innocents while their own people get killed for greed. The other fights for ideals. Bottom line - they should take it outside - just the TWO of them and keep everyone else out of harm's way. Loser stops whatever he's doing and the other stops as well. I don't understand how 2 obviously dumb boys can't grow up and settle their problems like men.
2006-09-19 21:01:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Equinox 6
·
3⤊
5⤋
Osama bin Ladin.
The 9/11 Commission reported that bin Laden had called for a “Hiroshima type event” on American soil. Since then, bin Laden received a fatwa, or religious ruling from a Saudi cleric justifying the use of weapons of mass destruction against America to kill “ten million”. One year ago bin Laden issued his “final warning” to America, the last step necessary in his self-justification to deliver a catastrophic attack on an American city."
Do the math and figure out who is the bigger terrorist.
2006-09-20 03:58:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
Osama and his followers surround themselves with women, children, and innocent people. That is why we did not get him in Afghanistan; there were too many children around him. Osama is nothing more than a coward. He brain-washes others to kill themselves for his brand of Islam. He hides like a pussy (a man who acts like a woman). He does not have the guts to do a suicide..., I mean homicide bombing himself, against the forces fighting terrorism. WHAT ABOUT IT? WHEN IS THE EFIMINATE OSAMA GOING TO QUITE SUCKING HIS MOTHER'S TIT AND FIGHT LIKE A MAN?
2006-09-20 04:02:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Come back to same ole' dribble. All that's left here on Bush's side are newbies for ya. The rest of us got bored, very bored. But i still respect you!
2006-09-20 04:43:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
a terrorist defnied is a radical who employs terror as a political weapon; usually organizes with other terrorists in small cells; often uses religion as a cover for terrorist activities.
You read the definition and come to your own conclusion.
2006-09-20 03:54:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Come on. Love it or leave it. Besides, you don't see Osama strapping himself with bombs and sacrificing himself for Allah. He is a brainwasher. At least our troops go willingly.
2006-09-20 04:05:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by kitty fresh & hissin' crew 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
osama of course, he has funded terrorists since the 80s, and he is evil, bush is just a f**king retard and complete douchebag
and BUD, what does "live the usa mean", just wondering
2006-09-20 03:58:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by C_Millionaire 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
Does that mean Bush gets 1224+ virgins. (17*72)
Not sure how much of it goes to dick Cheney and how much to Haliburton.
2006-09-20 04:02:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Amrendra 3
·
1⤊
4⤋
You've been spending too much time listening to Alan Combs.
2006-09-20 04:00:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by GeneL 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
These are two kind of terrorist.
A terrorist with long beard and a terrorist without beard.
2006-09-20 04:00:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by payman has lost his religion 4
·
1⤊
5⤋