seriously? this would be a really long answer. first thing, u can look the terms up in wikipedia. then u have to read many different books in order to get the whole picture from all different viewpoints.
2006-09-19 20:18:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by antigone 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no opposition between Communism and Democracy.
It goes Communism versus Capitalism, and democracy versus dictatorship. the philosophy of communism is not at odds with the philosophy of democracy, however, in many communist countries, only the communist party is allowed, as the leaders feel that they have the perfect ideology and any other political ideal is a step in the wrong direction.
Communism, as envisioned by Karl Marx could probably be considered to be democracy at about its purist. There is no central government. All major decisions would be taken by the society as a whole. Unfortunately, Marx' ideal society has never been achieved.
2006-09-19 20:28:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by waskelwabbit35 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Communism is economic. Democracy is political. Both have their good points and their bad points.
What I just wrote is pretty vague because economics and politics are tied to each other. The first sentence in Wikipedia is pretty good. It says, "Communism is an ideology that seeks to establish a future classless, stateless social organization, based upon common ownership of the means of production and the absence of private property." Capitalism seems to be the opposite because capitalists own things like apartment buildings and businesses. I believe that in Socialism the government owns everything.
For a pure democracy, which is something the ancient Greeks sometimes had, men (not women) would simply vote on each issue. This would be impossible in today's society, so we really have a Republic. In our Republic, we vote for people whom we believe would best represent our own interests. These elected officials then vote on the issues themselves. For a Dictatorship, the people themselves do not vote.
It seems that "communism" pertains to ownership, but "democracy" pertains to the act of voting.
I'm not at all an expert. This is mostly from the top of my head.
[I am really irked by alot of the answers to this question. People who are afraid of their own ignorance on this question use excuses such as, "You should do a search on google to find the answer." But exactly the same non-response could be used for *any* question. Our Government makes excuses for imposing sanctions on other countries--excuses such as "They're communists" or "They're a dictatorship" or "They don't have freedom." Americans, who really oftentimes seem to have no choice in the matter, apparently prefer to convince themselves that they agree with the Government; this requires that they convince themselves that they know what all the various words mean. As soon as a fellow voter asks a legitimate question, they say, "I know the answer, but don't ask me." I guess ignorance really is bliss, isn't it?].
2006-09-19 20:20:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Communism is the optimal degree of socialism. At which degree the state starts to wither away and there's a very classless society. Democracy can exist interior a socialist society. It did in the process the Paris commune and the 1st numerous years of the U.S. until eventually Stalin screwed issues up. yet heres the version: socialism (actual socialism, based upon workers councils) involves a workers democracy. A democracy of the staff. the U. S. government is seen a bourgeois democracy, the place the wealthy larger social classification is on top of issues. no longer the staff. back somebody will of path attempt to refute my assertion with the aid of asserting communism would not artwork, it may no longer, its proved it may no longer artwork etc etc. As somebody earlier me has mentioned communism has on no account been reached in any united states of america. Even in those retaining that the are/have been communist. Socialism has been performed to an volume. regrettably human beings associate communism with Stalinist totalitarianism. They immediately assume that because of the fact the U.S. grew to become out that way and China, N Korea etc blueprinted their structures upon Stalinism (that's thoroughly alien to Marxism) that each single attempt at construction a socialist society will finally end up that way. Such reasoning is lack of knowledge. They view issues from an incorrect historic abstraction. They fail to understand the excuses why those tries in those worldwide places grew to become out as they did: backwards financial device and way of existence etc. If one extremely desires to understand socialism, examine books with the aid of Marx, Trotsky, and Rosa Luxemburg between others to work out what they actually mentioned themselves earlier you write off socialism as quickly as and for all. in simple terms bear in strategies: communism isn't synonymous with tyranny in simple terms as capitalism isn't synonymous with democracy.
2016-10-15 05:05:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by valda 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The difference between Communism and Democracy...
Hmmmm, that's a tough one...
Nikita Kruschev said it best at a meeting to the United Nations once:" Communism is man exploiting man. Capitolism is just the opposite."
In all seriousness though, I wholeheartedly agree with waskelwabbit35.
See ya in the gulags.
2006-09-19 20:36:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by jwaitebsgl 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
everything.
democracy is usually associated with a 'free-market' which means if people can hit the right opportunities, they as individuals can make piles of money and be way richer than everyone else (that happens to like five people in a thousand).
communism is more like every body gets the same amount of riches from the country and the resources, has health care and benifits and social programs but usually comes with a dictator.
if you ask me, communism treats it's people better and when our 'democratic' politicians are in the office they act like dictators anyway.
2006-09-19 20:20:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by tami 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
In democracy there is freedom for people to accumulate their wealth and there is free competition in the market though monopoly exist. Whereas in communism all the wealth is distributed evenly by the government but here the people will not have any inducement to work and they will become lazy.
2006-09-19 20:26:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by ssmindia 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Control.
2006-09-19 20:23:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by coorissee 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Spelling.
And give me a break, you can easily look up both definitions by using google or other types of search engine. If you're so lazy that you can't look up the definition of a word by yourself you shouldn't be complaining about dumb answers people throw at you.
2006-09-19 20:18:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Genius 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The best answer is:
Communism: NOT FREE
Democracy: FREEDOM
2006-09-19 20:25:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by waty w 2
·
0⤊
0⤋