But our government allows mexico to harbor fugitives. Supporting mexican governments policy of protecting us criminals from being brought back. why can't we flood mexico with their illegals, and keep dog free.
2006-09-19 19:14:51 · 4 answers · asked by sllyjo 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
As much as I may not agree with Mexican laws, it is Mexico's sovereign right to create the laws they want. It's not so much that the U.S. "allows' Mexico to do anything. Mexico can do whatever she wants just as we can and do ourselves. As much as I like Dog, he broke the law in another country and he may have to pay for that.
Regarding sending illegals back to Mexico, if enough people here demand that and don't slack off on pressuring their elected representatives, then that'll happen. Likewise, if people don't pressure their representatives,. then nothing will happen.
2006-09-19 19:25:02 · answer #1 · answered by tonyend2001 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A fugitive is someone who should or needs to be detained. Your duty as a private citizen is to not only uphold the laws of the land, but to also assist the government by turning in known wanted people. By harboring a fugitive, you are allowing a potentially dangerous or harmful person to remain in the community to potentially hurt or cause damage to someone again. You are opening not only yourself but every other person to the possibilities of more crimes. You can also be held as accessory if any crimes are committed while you hide this individual from shirking up to his responsibilities for the crime he committed.
2006-09-19 19:25:57 · answer #2 · answered by tomandsyndi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This makes you an acessory to the crime commited. Lets say You get a call from your friend he said he justcommitted a murder
ask you may I hide at your house? you say yes..this makes u a part of the crime..
2006-09-19 19:27:42 · answer #3 · answered by Lilmisssassy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Go ask another red-neck. You're in the wrong site
2006-09-19 19:37:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋