English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Actually I will not allow my kid to listen to him speak, because he is such a bad example, like a lousy book....you steer your kid away. After all this President is inarticulate, albeit his home language, grammatically void, and inept with vocab and pronounciation.

2006-09-19 18:43:13 · 18 answers · asked by MelanieMediator 2 in Politics & Government Politics

Justanotherengine:
My next question woul be why do the REPUB RIGHTwing always bring Clinton into the picture when they are unable to defend Bush? Maybe justanotherschmendrik can answer that one. What part of Clinton's presidency is an excuse for BUSH's lies? For his pretending that 9/11 had anything to do wit Iraq, failing in Afghanistan and for folling schmendriks like you?

2006-09-19 18:54:56 · update #1

I am perfectly aware that Lincoln and many others did not write their own speeches. Thats okay and I am thankful that BUSH's speeches are written for him so we are not embarrased everytime the guy speaks. Did you hear him toasting KOFI in the UN today. It was an impromptu speech. He could not hold a sentence. He had nothing substantial to say - in short it was embarrasing. I bet Licoln was quite able to make an articulate toast. Lincoln was a statesman, BUSH is a Cowboy who rides his horse backwards.

2006-09-19 18:59:16 · update #2

18 answers

Could be lots of reasons:
Never did his homework; or
Never attended school;

Too much alcohol & drug use- re-fried brain;
Unsure of himself;
Low IQ;

Notice when he speaks without a written speech, ie. improv he really makes a fool of himself.

2006-09-19 18:48:33 · answer #1 · answered by meldorhan 4 · 0 1

With malice for none and charity for all maybe we shouldn't be so hard on the man. It is entirely possible that he doesn't mangle the language intentionally and that there is an underlying organic cause to his speech patterns.
It could the result of dain bramage from the long term and excessive use of intoxicants
It could be early Alzheimer's
It could that he's on meds for something that we won't find out about for another generation
Regardless it's hard to ignore the fact that the his dots don't always connect.
Edit 9/20 12;115PM
The question then becomes whether not Mr. Bush's speech impairments are limited to and only concern the speech centers of his brain, in which case [ like Bill Clinton's sexual habits] they are a private matter and are not a cause for alarm by the American people or whether the speech impairments are tied into the parts of Mr. Bush's brain that are used for reason, in which case the American people do have the right to know.

2006-09-19 20:35:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

His own mother has hinted that he has a learning disability and reading disorder.

Or, maybe too much booze and cocaine.

Or, maybe the most obvious answer : terminal stupidity.
*******************************************
*******************************************
**********************************************

Justanotherengine –

Yes, I prefer the morals, intelligence, leadership, and integrity of Bill Clinton to Bush.

Here are just a couple of the potentially thousand reasons:

Only weeks after Clinton took office in 1993 (following 12 straight years of Republican presidents, terrorist scum tried to bring down the towers.

What did Clinton do?

Within a month, four people were arrested,
They went on trial that September,
The trial lasted 6 months, and
They were all convicted

Are you aware that Clinton stopped eight 9/11-size attacks, despite a Republican Congress that tried to stop his every move?

Are you aware that:

the very first thing that Clinton did, as he was leaving the White House and Bush was moving in, was to tell Bush that the single greatest threat to the safety of the American people was Osama Bin-Laden. He had his staff stress to Bush’s staff that this was the most important thing Bush needed to know now that he was President.

Are you aware that:

on August 6, 2001, Bush received a PDBM (President Daily Briefing Memo) warning that:
OBL was planning an attack inside the United States, and
that he might use airplanes, and
that the targets would be politically important (DC) and major metropolitan centers (NYC).


Are you aware that Bush, Rice, and the rest of the Bush administration ignored the memo?
Are you aware that the Bush administration abandoned the Israeli – Palestinian issue?

Are you aware that Bush abandoned the war on terror to invade Iraq which, according to your own Republican Congress’s report on pre-war intelligence:
there were NO terrorists in Iraq before Bush invaded
was no connection between Iraq and OBL, AQ, or any terrorist organization
Hussein did not allow training camps
Hussein hated AQ before we did
Hussein did not hide al-Zargawi - he tried to have him arrested

Are you aware that:
The Taliban are stronger in Afghanistan now that they were before Bush invaded
That opium production is Afghanistan is a record levels and the money from it fills terrorist’s pockets

Are you aware that - Bush is losing in Iraq?
Are you aware that – Bush is losing the war on terror?

Are you aware that – Bush has destroyed America’s dignity, honor, and reputation?

Of course you are aware of all this.

You know these things and yet you support Bush, because like all right-wing scum you are an idiot and, worse, a traitor to the United States who supports the spilling of American to the altar of Osama Bin-Laden.

Will your lust for American blood be satisfied when Republicans have killed more Americans than OBL and AQ?

The First Amendment does not say that stupid white-trash Christian scum get to make the rules and run the country

**********************************
**********************************
p2of9

we're aware that you are a moron -

How do you explain the speeches (including Gettysburg Address), written in his own hand?

You can't explain it because you are stupid.
You won't explain yourself because you are a liar.

2006-09-19 18:47:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

He apparently was the same as a child as he is now, unable to or unwilling to listen. He does not have the capacity to learn and that is why someone suggested that he make education his "pet" project. He is an embarrassment to our nation. He gives Yale a very bad name. I would much rather have the person in charge be a womanizer than be an idiot that couldn't spell womanizer.Wouldn't anyone with sense rather have their pres. screw an intern than screw the country. Hillary was the only one hurt by Bill Clinton , the rest of us thrived under his leadership/

2006-09-19 18:51:42 · answer #4 · answered by unforgettable_1 3 · 1 1

I agree with you. He probably could undergo coaching and extended training programs that would improve his presentation but he should have done this while in school or shortly afterwards.

It is a tribute to the corruption of our political system that such a poor presenter was able to make it not only to governor but president.

2006-09-19 18:46:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I totally agree with you! It is so embarrassing to listen to him!
I feel there are 2 must haves for a person to become the president of USA. It is important for the president to be a great speaker and speak the English language eloquently. It is also important for him to have served in the armed forces since he is their commander and chief.
Clinton was a scholar and a outstanding speaker!

2006-09-19 18:55:01 · answer #6 · answered by rose 3 · 1 1

Are you aware that Abe Lincoln didn't write his own speeches? Everybody is bad at something. Even a president.

2006-09-19 18:49:54 · answer #7 · answered by p2of9 4 · 1 0

Are you truthfully so naive to think of that the President controls the White abode line? further, do you truthfully think of that the president has ever listened to any of the comments on that line? How does no longer desirous to hearken to uninformed people rant approximately how they hate him make him a coward? what's extra cowardly, no longer having a remark line or sitting in the back of your demonstrate demonstrate screen complaining approximately idiotic issues?

2016-10-01 04:13:26 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

perhaps you prefer the morals of Bill Clinton, wonderful speech giver, he paved the way for 911, Lied like Hell, and was a womanizer, wonderful example of a man and president.

2006-09-19 18:47:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I just cringe everytime I see him in front of reporters....I beg the Lord to let reporters "ask Blair please!" Cause GW can always find some good way to put his foot in his mouth and let the toejamm flow..........;-)

And whats really funny, is in the stock market, generally speaking, if you go short the market when he starts to speak, you are sure to make money! Hahahaha!

2006-09-19 18:53:15 · answer #10 · answered by jazzzame 4 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers