English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

good question, i do not know!

2006-09-19 18:34:01 · answer #1 · answered by sweets 4 · 0 0

I don't think testosterone would make a difference, although I did hear about a male birth control pill that was being tested a while back. It never made it into the market place because studies found that it would not sell well for two reasons:

1- Men said they felt that it somehow emasculated them to shoot blanks on purpose

and

2- Women said they would not necessarily trust a man to take the pill regularly, and would rather have control of their own reproductive health.

2006-09-20 07:11:55 · answer #2 · answered by biogirl 3 · 1 0

Natural testosterone boosts sexual desire, it does not reduce it. In excess, it can lead to a shrinkage of sorts to the genitals. Regardless, to the best of my knowledge, hormones still will not kill sperm (hormones, real or synthetic, being the base or byproduct of most steroids). The best form of contraception was invented in 1913 by Gideon Sundback, and is 100% effective - the zipper.

2006-09-19 18:36:24 · answer #3 · answered by Jeremy L 2 · 0 0

Because it is called chemical inprisonment. Males don't offer to take something to prevent pregnacy unless it is the old snip snip. THe only time I have heard of men taking something is ususally court ordered due to some kind of sexual offence. For centurys it has almays been the women to make sure there is some kind of pertection. I think in this day and age both should be.

2006-09-19 18:38:24 · answer #4 · answered by melindarix@sbcglobal.net 4 · 0 0

As a guy, i in my view can no longer relate to correctly to the strategies in contact, yet... i've got self belief that's the female's determination. because's an high priced and invasive technique (any technique includes some threat) she may well be making selections she could experience sorry approximately later. additionally, do no longer assume women take the alternative gently. for many (no longer all) that's a wrenching determination that they be worrying over for years after. additionally - self-adverse behaviour, which includes promiscuity and disrespect for the outcomes, is often an indication of deep emotional disturbance; I doubt she's lazy or hornee - greater possibly suffering emotional themes like early abuse, rape, psychological themes, etc. Who is familiar with? perhaps she needs a infant and her mothers and fathers keep twisting her arm to get an abortion, and repeat being pregnant is her way of "getting even". From a strictly financial viewpoint, start administration is a heckuva lot greater inexpensive than 4 because of the fact November, and you will get long-term answer like implants or the injections... nevertheless, in case you enable a call like abortion to be strictly the mummy's, then there'll constantly be people who abuse it. you are able to no longer write a coverage that's fool-information. that's like unfastened speech - you enable unfastened speech and human beings have the superb to assert stuff that truly disgusts you; comparable with abortion - you enable it and a few will abuse it. Feminists fought no longer trouble-free for the superb to have determination, in user-friendly terms to discover for occasion that East Indians used it to abort ladies because of the fact daddy needs in user-friendly terms sons. Or, some women use it as start administration... Do you extremely think of the state ought to rigidity some human beings to take start administration? the place does it supply up? License mothers and fathers and in user-friendly terms enable the "good" ones to conceive? (might that incorporate the "good shade"?) rigidity abortions the minute you go onto welfare? (it is not that stupid or no longer likely, they used to rigidity-sterilize "imbeciles" interior the stable old days). i think of that's a stable thought if the government keeps that's nostril completely out of human beings's reproduction behavior and selections. maximum human beings will do the superb element, and those that don't, properly, that's why that's referred to as a "unfastened" society. BTW, Congratulations!

2016-10-15 04:56:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Testerone has nothing to do with male fertility.

2006-09-19 18:39:21 · answer #6 · answered by kylebakesb 2 · 0 0

because it would have to be something that keeps the sperm from entering their semen. and men arent too reliable.

2006-09-19 18:34:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers