Eurogenic, Afrogenic, Sinogenic. that takes care of 3 racial groups.
then we have Indogenic, that's 4. What "______genic' can we call the Native Americans? The Aborigines, the Pacific Islanders?
2006-09-19
18:23:04
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Cultures & Groups
➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
Nikki, do you give snotty answers when the question is well above your head? How goes your slow-learner class?
2006-09-19
18:32:11 ·
update #1
I think it would be best just to leave it the way it is.It would cause more problems than it would solve.
For example, the Aboriginies (who are Pacific Islanders),are considered *******.Under your definition, they would not be "Afrogenic".Then you would have to call them something else."Pseudo-Afrogenic" or "Pre-Afrogenic"?
The North Africans and some East Africans would differ with your categorization.Arabs are classified as Caucasian.This would also include Egyptians, Ethiopians, and some Somalians.Somalians consider themselves to be Arabs.
The Native Americans are considered descendents of Asians.As for "Sinogenic"."Sino" is Japanese.Who are distantly related to the Koreans.
"Eurogenic" sounds to me that it just refers to whites in Europe.Though Caucasians range from Europe (Spain to the Ural mountains in Russia),North Africa,Middle East,Central Asia all the way to India.Their skin color ranges from white,olive,brown to virtually black.
In Africa skin color ranges from light to medium brown(North Africa).Medium brown to dark brown(Southern Africa,parts of East Africa).Dark brown to black (Central and West Africa).
In East Asia, skin color ranges from an almost white ("Yellow") to dark brown.
The three racial groups is probably the best it can get.The difficulty would be the ethnic groups within the racial groups.
In many places around the world,in the same continent or even in the same country, not everyone is exactly alike.
2006-09-19 19:27:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by david g 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
that is properly primary that it is the Asians. China on my own having the biggest inhabitants and the land mass for them is lowering by way of fact the inhabitants maintains to boost. yet there are nonetheless no longer many Asians interior the U. S..
2016-10-01 04:12:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is this a project your slow learner class is working on?
2006-09-19 18:25:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by chris 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Ummm what about Aussies?
Y -genic?
Dunno if that'll take off but ahh good luck.
2006-09-19 18:32:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
You're talkin ethnicities, not race. Race is solely the color of skin.
2006-09-19 18:27:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
yeah dude, thats pretty much been taken care of:
Caucasoid
Mongaloid
*******
2006-09-20 05:36:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Umm....no
2006-09-19 18:57:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by glow 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
What's wrong with caucasian, mongoloid, and *******?
2006-09-19 18:32:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Scott K 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
How about just HUMAN?
2006-09-19 19:13:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋