2006-09-19 18:17:49 · 38 answers · asked by Josh 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Not under any circumstances. She is too transparently two faced. All politicians have a certain amount of this - regardless of party (I was a minor elected official for a while, and include myself in this list). However, while a Senator or Representative running their lives on polls is one thing - one could say they are trying to represent the will of the people, that is their job; but for an executive branch position, you must be willing to put your views out, on the line, and stand by them, regardless of polls. Remember, the legislative branch represents individuals, the executive branch represents itself. At least that's how the Constitution set it up.
2006-09-19 18:24:42 · answer #1 · answered by Jeremy L 2 · 7⤊ 2⤋
Definitely! Wouldn't you? But, I'd vote for Laura Bush or Lynn Cheney if either of them were running. I'd NEVER vote for Condoleeza Rice. It's not a racial thing - Condi is an idiot & could use a few make-overs. Ugly can be changed - idiocy is for life!
2006-09-21 02:47:17 · answer #2 · answered by fuhqutoo 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's about time to have a lady President in the US and Hillary Clinton is qualified with flying colors. I'll vote for her.
2006-09-19 19:22:35 · answer #3 · answered by anobangtanong 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No way,one clinton was enough and is the REAL reason for the problems that Bush has to take care now
2006-09-19 19:44:46 · answer #4 · answered by Roy F 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hell no, she only has any credibility because she was the First Lady and if anyone remembers Clinton's first term when he put her in charge of health care she came up with one of the worst health care plan in history.
2006-09-19 18:27:15 · answer #5 · answered by kylebakesb 2 · 6⤊ 0⤋
No Way...Not another Clinton in the White house...no,no! Big NO NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The other Clinton was a joke..where would she stick the cigar?
2006-09-19 18:49:24 · answer #6 · answered by sdrose17 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
confident, because of the fact of two user-friendly information. A: she has the historic past, journey, and the credentials to do a stable pastime, and shall we face it, can we heavily want yet another republican working this united states of america??? we've had one for 7 years and function been at conflict for about 6.5 of them, our united states of america debt has greater suitable to an insane volume, and the country is going to hell in a hand basket, do in simple terms a sprint analysis. have confidence me VOTE democrat, and Vote Hilary, if for NO different reason than she is the spouse of a guy who grew to become into president for 8 years and we as a rustic enjoyed 8 years of peace and prosperity. Hilary is definately the thank you to circulate, in spite of character, she's have been given credentials... think of of it this variety, in case you mandatory heart surgical treatment and the final achievable surgion grew to become into seen as somewhat icy and impersonal, yet did their pastime to perfection, might you nevertheless want them engaged on you? precisely! B: That and the fact that Obama doen't have adequate political historic past or journey to run a fricken warm canines stand outdoors of the white homestead... yet he gets lots of votes for being Black. Grrrrr... it boils my blood. C: Edwards is likewise too youthful and green to do the pastime like it ought to be achieved, yet additionally gets lots of votes because of the fact some human beings wont vote for the female or the black guy based on the titles I in simple terms gave them... back... grrrr... Hilary in 2008!!!!!!!! additionally, "koalatcomics" needs to study his information because of the fact greater suitable than 0.5 of them are the two deceptive OR outright fake!!! And Clinton grew to become into no longer impeached, the final president to be impeached grew to become into Nixon, who deserved it and sweetness, ask your self, he grew to become right into a republican. And on a similar time as below the subject count of impeachment, how is it a darn close to impeachable offese to be cheating approximately greater-marital affairs, yet invading a rustic with out foundation for attack, ensuing interior the homicide of 1000's isn't? How off whack is that??? (thinking to self: filthy,sneaking, mendacity conservatives...)
2016-10-15 04:56:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Never. No. Hopeless. Forget it. Out of the question. Monumental goof!
Did I mention that I wouldn't vote for her?
2006-09-19 18:27:18 · answer #8 · answered by old lady 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Never in a million years.
2006-09-19 19:21:24 · answer #9 · answered by stellablue1959 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
My answer is no, but i find it really disheartening to see the number of "If she was the democratic candidate I would" comments
is that really the way to choose your elected officials, by the little d or r next to their names.
2006-09-19 18:34:40 · answer #10 · answered by shoeshineboy 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋