Okay, so you have the first amendment covered. It's the fourth that most people are concerned about. For instance, authorizing warrantless wiretaps against American citizens is clearly prohibited. Part of his terror stragety includes putting people (americans, too) in jail with no charges, no right to an attorney, with the burden of proof on them, for indefinite periods of time. And all that would be a great way to stop terrorists. If only we knew which ones were terrorists. But with no trials, no weighing of the evidence, and relying sometimes only on hearsay or phonelogs, we have no idea who's behind bars. And if you think these people all just have to be dangerous terrorists, why are some of them being released by the hundreds, with no explanation?
2006-09-19 17:10:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by answersBeta2.1 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
compared to what? he allows what he can't stop by lending
a deaf ear . Freedom of speech for a politician is only freedom of dishonesty, Freedom of religion is only freedom to be an opiated puppet, Freedom of petition is only freedom of hot air,Freedom of the press is only propaganda tainted news and muddled reporting , Freedom of assembly and when was the last time it did anything good our apathy won't allow it not since the civil rights era has it actually meant anything to a placated society . Did he placate u with false analysis and phony promises....There is very little real freedom one can fight for and nothing to die for......Mostly these blind patriots are just proliferating Bovine fecal matter....
2006-09-19 17:20:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by dogpatch USA 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
After the September 11 attacks, with virtually no debate, Congress passed and President Bush signed the USA PATRIOT Act. There are significant flaws in the Patriot Act, flaws that threaten your fundamental freedoms by giving the government the power to access to your medical records, tax records, information about the books you buy or borrow without probable cause, and the power to break into your home and conduct secret searches without telling you for weeks, months, or indefinitely.
2006-09-19 17:07:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by lanes 3
·
5⤊
1⤋
President Bush ( aka The Dictator ) stirs such fury in this kinfolk, he's watched as low as achieveable. This fool tries to place across despite his speech writers prefer him to declare ( or Chaney ). perhaps if we could desire to get our palms on a number of those tin foil hats (thank you, gildamcge), we could desire to take a seat by this idiots dribble. He stole the 1st election. God purely is conscious how he have been given in a 2d term. with a bit of luck the idiots who voted for him two times will stay abode next election day in the event that they could't make saner alternatives. Terrorism is incorrect. however the Bible speaks "of wars and rumors of wars..." this could be with us as time lasts. although i could sense lots extra constructive if we had an sensible President looking out for our wellbeing
2016-10-17 07:42:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He has taken away our fourth amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure. He has taken away our fifth amendment right of due process of law. He has greatly infringed upon our right to freedom of travel. He has taken away our right to privacy. He has overthrown the Constitutional limitations of his office, thereby taking away the People's right to govern via delegated powers.
2006-09-19 17:10:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Paladin 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
He is trying to take away our right to buy virtually non traceable prepaid cell phones, and call afghanastan during a time of war without it possibly be monitored to make sure we are not terrrorists.
HOW DARE HE! Its in the constitution that I should be able to do this!
---------
I guess some of these morons above me don't realize that the patriot act is not a blanket that covers every search. They just do what liberals like to do, and listen to 5% of something, and draw conclusions about it.
2006-09-19 17:10:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
I say freedom of speech....Howard Stern couldn't say anything about Bush on air without getting fined significantly for it.
2006-09-19 17:13:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by pickitngrin 2
·
3⤊
2⤋
This should take care of a freedom he has taking away. Don't worry it only affects 50 million people http://www.nysut.org/newyorkteacher/2004-2005/040909washingtonwatch.html
Don't worry this freedom he's taking away only effects all of America http://forums.hybridz.org/showthread.php?t=95225
This freedom he's taken away only affects North America http://www.progress.org/rights01.htm
I think I'm done making an *** out of you.
2006-09-19 17:07:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
Fascism is subtle, like carbon monoxide poisoning. Check out website below.
2006-09-19 17:15:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Grinning Soul 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
Our right to privacy and yes he has taken away freedom of speech. People who have spoken out against him have been "punished". It is a fact, so do you're research better next time.
2006-09-19 17:06:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mrs. Waiting 2
·
3⤊
4⤋