Beth (his wife) posted the bond. Yeah- the case that he was attrest because of is the one that gained him publicity. I feel bad- he did a good thing bring the guy back to the USA.
2006-09-19 15:58:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lady in Pink 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is out on bond on house arrest. He could still go to prison for getting the prisoner. No I think Andrew Luster being from the Max Factor family has big money. Mexico is corupt and likes money. They seem to run their country by kickbacks. Bush is procorporation and I could understand why he does not want to hurt one of his corporate families. It does not make it right, but that are where Bush keeps his alliance. Bush seems to like Mexico and Fox. He really wants what is best for the top 1% and big business. Andrew Luster just used drugs on his victums. He was more of a deviant and a rich man. He did not seem to have a drug mafia connection. He had money to play on his own with. He did not seem to need to work in a legal or illegal way for it. He just spent his time doing deviant things to women against their will.
In Mexico the dollar talks. Police take bribes. It is very corupt. They will take an American in if they are rich. Money talks. They do not seem to be concerned for the protection of their own children. This referers to the government and not the individual families who have good values and are often devout Catholics.
I just think it is a connection between Luster's money and Mexico. Bush and Lusters coroporate family.
If this had been some poor man I do not think this would have been an issue to anyone. I do not think Mexico would have cared. I do not think our federal government would have done anything about it. I think there is a trail of money somewhere in this. We just need to follow it.
Otherwise why would they be allowing this to happen to women. They are not saying these are gay people or prostitiutes or runaways. They are not using the excuse that these are the so called disposable members of society. Every life is valuable and no one has the right to mess with it.
I just think that there is some money involved her that is causing this to be allowed. It must be.
I wish Bush would prove me wrong and be the family values president the people who voted for him wished for I did not vote for him, but he promised them that. I wish he would show some chrisitan morals he says he has.
I just wish he would prove me wrong. Take care of this and defend his people. His daughters are wild and go to clubs. I just wish he could understand and think about if this happened to them.
2006-09-19 20:17:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by adobeprincess 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Do you thinks it's acceptable for Russian or Germans to come into this country and apprehend people with disregard for the law??"
If our government was such that their criminals could -easily- hide out here, then yes.
To my knowlege, Dog didn't hurt anyone when he went and got Luster. The only law he broke down there was by bounty hunting and then refusing to give him over to Mexican authorities. Which, btw, was a misdemeanor. Not worth the fuss of extradition...unless there was money involved.
2006-09-22 00:16:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Krystal C 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
LOOK PEOPLE, He broke the LAW !
He knew it, he was arrested for it AND refused to go back to Mexico for court---THE SAME EXACT THING HE GETS RATINGS FOR ON TV EVERY WEEK.
He got the bad guy off he streets but you see, he was guarenteed the DOG series if he did.
Do you thinks it's acceptable for Russian or Germans to come into this country and apprehend people with disregard for the law??
Mexico has egg on their face over this, America has a treaty with Mexico, an Extradiction Treaty. All they had to do was inform the authorities and the legal system would have handled it. But that would mean lower or no ratings................
2006-09-19 16:17:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mike B 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Dog is on the loose
2006-09-19 15:55:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
hes out on bail he lives about 30 mins from me
2006-09-19 15:58:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jenna 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They should let him go only if he agrees to cut that 1986 mullet off.
2006-09-19 15:59:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by EARNEYW 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think so.
2006-09-19 15:58:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by nonexistentdog 3
·
0⤊
0⤋