Ahmadinejad can dodge questions well and is adept at reading a speech. He is a Mahdaviat (a person who believes in and prepares for the Mahdi.) Ahmadinejad spoke at the UN in 2005 and alluded to Imam Mahdi. In his speech of September 19, 2006 at the UN he averred, "I emphatically declare that today's world, more than ever before, longs for just and righteous people with love for all humanity; and above all longs for the perfect righteous human being and the real savior who has been promised to all peoples and who will establish justice, peace and brotherhood on the planet." Then he prayed, ""Oh, Almighty God, all men and women are your creatures and you have ordained their guidance and salvation. Bestow upon humanity that thirsts for justice, the perfect human being promised to all by you, and make us among his followers and among those who strive for his return and his cause."
The whois registration of his website lists his first name as mahdi http://lvb.net/item/3255
According to Shiites, the 12th imam disappeared as a child in the year 941. When he returns, they believe, he will reign on earth for seven years, before bringing about a final judgment and the end of the world.
Under Iran's constitution, the highest government official and commander-in-chief of the military is the Supreme Leader. The first Supreme Leader was Ayatollah Khomeni. The current Supreme Leader is Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Khamenei. Both the Supreme Leader and President Ahmadinejad have apocalyptic views. They want to bring about the zuhur (appearance) of Imam Mahdi. They want to establish a Shiite Khalifah (empire) from Iran to Lebanon.
Ahmadinejad choose his words well for the speech at the UN on September 19. Instead of naming names he says "some" [individual's] behavior is not worthy of human beings and runs counter to the Truth, to justice and to human dignity.
Ahmadinejad emphasized, The occupiers are incapable of establishing security in Iraq...there are covert and overt efforts to heighten insecurity, magnify and aggravate differences within Iraqi society, and instigate civil strife...It seems that intensification of hostilities and terrorism serves as a pretext for the continued presence of foreign forces in Iraq. Where can the people of Iraq seek refuge, and from whom should the Government of Iraq seek justice?
Next he discusses Palestine and Lebanon. Then he reiterates the statement made in other speeches, "The Islamic Republic of Iran is a member of the IAEA and is committed to the NPT. All our nuclear activities are transparent, peaceful and under the watchful eyes of IAEA inspectors." Maybe he has said that so often that he really believes it. It was over the issue of inspections that the current situation arose. Furthermore, there is an addendum to the NPT that Iran never signed.
Then finally, he names names,
"The question needs to be asked: if the Governments of the United States or the United Kingdom, who are permanent members of the Security Council, commit aggression, occupation and violation of international law, which of the organs of the UN can take them to account?"
Then he ended with the prayer for the mahdi.
.
2006-09-23 13:12:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, he sounded like President Bush.
In fact as I've begun to look more and more into President Ahmadinejad, I've noticed that he and President Bush have similar leadership styles.....which explains why our nations are where they are diplomatically.
Just something I've noticed.
If he wanted to sound like a "typical" Democrat (and there are so few real liberal Democrats...I mean let's be honest I'm a liberal and even I can't find the real liberal Democrats...just saying) then he'd have to basically just bash Bush (which he didn't do, he actually articulated ideas...just like Bush usually does...you know because Bush doesn't bash Democrats as often as his Republican counterparts in Congress, he usually in his speeches presents his perspective and ideas and that's what Ahmadinejad did, too). Oh and if he wanted to sound like a "typical" Democrat he'd have to take up all the opposite positions of his opponent (which coincidently, by the sounds of his speech, on some issues he actually agrees with Bush).
For the record I am a registered Democrat
(former Republican registered and barely registered Democrat...maybe I should just choose "Independent"...in my State that's the only other option, there are no other political parties allowed...and just last year the Libertarian Party sued the State and lost, so it's either R, D, or I in the State where I reside on all political levels: local, county, State, and national)
2006-09-19 18:57:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by gabriel_zachary 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
that guy is rather a formidable liar. besides isnt it humorous how he stated maximum folk of people believe it replaced into an interior pastime. Um that may not authentic. and which would be seen by the majoirty of people actual believing and saying that. he's rather mind-blowing, he can upward thrust up there, pull crap suggestions from his butt and actual believe it. it extremely is a guy who stated there are not any homosexuals in Iran. a 12 months later accused his political opponent on advertising out Iranians for votes with thieves,murderers and homosexuals in Iran... WAIT!!! Say that back... homosexuals! He contradicts himself in very just about each and every thing he says. yet he nevertheless believes he's authentic?!?!
2016-10-17 07:31:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you were to close your eyes you could see John Kerry up there ranting and Chavez sounded just like John Dean.
Do you think they all use the same speech writers?
When did being a patriot go out of liberal fashion?
2006-09-23 03:14:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by rmagedon 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes: He pretty much managed to blame every single thing wrong in the world on the US. Which is exactly what libs do all the time. Which just goes to show you if Irans president ever ran for office in the USA he would run as a LIB and win. Maybe thats why Libs can't win elections here all there best candidates are dictators in foreign lands lol.
2006-09-19 14:53:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
i Acyully liked his spech!...i dont think of him as a "bad man" anymore as US governmnet had claimed he is one!...
here is part of his spech...
“I think that the people who give political advice to the pope were not well informed,” Ahmadinejad said. “... I think that he actually takes back his statement, and there is no problem. He should be careful that those who want war do not take advantage of his statements and use it for their own causes.”
Look!..he is right!...Pope didnt have right to say those words even if it was right!..he has given the chance to those who want to take advantage!
2006-09-19 14:56:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by zoha 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
He is not stupid. He's been coached on what to say, and how to say it. Sad thing is, the UN is siding with him. lol. Unreal isn't it? But then again we can't be supprised. I wish the US would have another civil war. That is the only way people with any common will survive.
2006-09-19 14:54:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
He sounded like a guy that talked a lot of smack and then ran from Bush when he had the chance to corner him at dinner. I honestly think he is into sheep, did anyone else see the velcro gloves in his pocket?
2006-09-19 14:54:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
NO he did not sound like a typical liberal, but the interpreter sure did
2006-09-19 14:51:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by rallman@sbcglobal.net 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Nice try, remember this?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,212122,00.html
It's even on Fox"news" hahahahaha
He's the Iranian Bush
2006-09-19 14:55:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Dastardly 6
·
1⤊
1⤋