Do you think they lost to Dallas, and Minnesota to help the image of the league? You know, so that one team doesn't dominate.
Or do you think they lost a couple of games so that they could launch a ferocious, dramatic, comeback?
Everyone knows they're going to win the Super Bowl.
2006-09-19 14:10:05 · 12 answers · asked by conservativeguyfromnc 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
its funny how a team can start the season 0-2 and all of a sudden "they suck"
some people are just morons, they have basically the same team as last year and they were in the playoffs
actually they have a better team then last year but they just have stumbled out of the gate
they have played 2 very good teams so far
i expect the redskins to starting winning, and get a wild card spot
2006-09-19 15:33:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Haha. What kind of answers are you expecting here?
"Yes, they are purposely losing to help the league's image." ?
--- The league doesn't have an image problem. You must be thinking of baseball.
"Yes, a dramatic comeback helps ticket sales" ?
--- Their games are already sold out, and losing would hurt revenue. (merchandise, advertisers, etc.)
You say "everyone knows they're going to win the Super Bowl".
Well that's funny because everyone BUT THEM must know.
The only way they are winning the Super Bowl is if they get together and play Madden on their PlayStation or Xbox.
Wait.. I'm not even sure the game will let them win. The programmers DO want to make it as real as possible so they can't have crazy stuff happen like Washington actually winning the SuperBowl.
Isn't that a sign of the apocalypse?
P.S. To the guy who said they they are "only 0-2". You're right, 2 losses isn't much if they played 100 games. But losing the first 2 out of 16 total? They've already lost 12.5% of their games.
2006-09-19 22:34:29 · answer #2 · answered by FantasyGuru 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think they lost because they need a decent QB. Brunell is getting too old. He didn't throw any long passes even though moss was open deep on several occasions. In his defense I will say that the Dallas defense was teeing off on him without the support of a running game. That will change when Portis returns. I still look for them to improve as the season progresses and they have a good chance of making the superbowl. I don't think they lost on purpose unless someone paid Brunell lots of bucks to throw the game. I still can't figure out why Gibbs got rid of Arrington.
2006-09-19 22:12:10 · answer #3 · answered by maverickmagi 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Help the image of the league? Are you serious? I think the NFL has there image under control. And no! You can bet Daniel Snyder isn't going to be throwing any games to the Cowboys! He hates the Boys! As for the Super Bowl, It could happen but I doubt it!
2006-09-20 00:01:50 · answer #4 · answered by noname 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Has it ever popped into ur head that the Redskins aint shyt. Ive been telling u skins fans that ur not better than the G-Men but nooo ya dont wanna listen. Skins were the worst team in the playoffs and like always they make off-season moves just to not have em work out.
2006-09-19 21:16:36 · answer #5 · answered by Luigi 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Obviously you have access to some very good drugs.
2006-09-19 21:38:53 · answer #6 · answered by stan l 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I hope they lose every game because their ****** *** fans cross dress to the games and their mascot is a racial slur
2006-09-19 21:15:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
srry but they arent losing on purpose.
2006-09-19 22:30:09 · answer #8 · answered by oakcliff_maverick 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Umm... they aren't purposely losing...
2006-09-19 21:19:52 · answer #9 · answered by cheesehead 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
put the pipe down....just say no...it still applies...
2006-09-19 21:24:07 · answer #10 · answered by KT 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋