'a plant grows better in sunlight becuz artificial light takes longer and sunlight does not.' does that makes sence to you?
2006-09-19 14:08:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by thee wojc 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Natural sunlight versus artificial light in the growth and production of plant life."
You have a very broad thesis to prove one way or another. Natural sunlight is of course the best light in which to grow plants, however it may soon come to the point where we will have to look to artificial light to grow plants. With the expansion the population more land is being developed and it stands to reason that in the future some crops and plants will be grown in large indoor areas. This would require artificial light to be utilized to grow these plants.
2006-09-19 14:25:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Only hell mama ever raised 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It sounds good, but there are some technical challenges.
There are several forms of artificial light. "Grow lights' produce a good spectrum for plants, and the come in fluorescent and incandescent.
Second, you need to determine the placement and the timing of the lights so both groups get the same amount of light.
Third, lamps produce heat, you will need to set it up so that the artificial light group is roughly the same temperature.
If you can control for these variables, you can do some good science.
2006-09-19 14:24:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by novangelis 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Plants grow best in natural light than artificial light, as natural light gives the plants a higher rate of photosynthesis.
2006-09-19 14:09:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by penpallermel 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
'A plant should grow best in natural light as compared to artificial light as the plant has evolved to use the lightwave frequencies that the sun provides'
Be warned, i got a C for biology. And i might be wrong as all visible light is at the same wavelength.
In fact scrap this whole answer; but vote for it as best answer anyway!
2006-09-19 14:15:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by acestony 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
or "if one plant is placed in sunlight and the other is placed in artificial light, then the plant laced in teh sunlight will grow better." prob shouldnt say better....a more objective term would be like "will grow taller than the one in the artificial light."
2006-09-19 14:17:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your hypothesis should be a complete statement. One sentence if possible. What says is nothing more than an educated guess at what your experiment notes will tell you. It doesn't have to be right or wrong. That's why you "hypothesize" and then do the experiment to find out if your best guess was right. Either way you learn from your experiment. Make sense?
2006-09-19 14:17:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ricky J. 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
How about demonstrating that batteries in sequence reason voltage to operate, yet batteries in parallel, guard an analogous voltage yet can strengthen more advantageous present day. you want some batteries and a volt meter. you should string a million, then 2, then 3, then 4 batteries in sequence and diploma the voltage anytime and word it upload up. you could get less expensive volt meters (10 funds or so) at radio shack and different places. you should probable borrow one. many human beings have them of their device packing bins.
2016-11-28 03:01:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by hone 3
·
0⤊
0⤋