Hitler was more popular and more intelligent
Adolf Hitler served during war time and in a war zone. George Bush Jr. very blatantly dodged the draft by using political influence..
Adolf Hitler took over a small nation that was bankrupt, in the throes of hyperinflation, disarmed, and demoralized. And in a few short years he turned it into a power that overran almost all of Europe. George Bush junior took two large, and by all accounts successful, corporations and ran them both into the ground, cost three million Americans their jobs, and turned a huge financial surplus into an equally huge deficit.
Hitler targetted Jews because every despot needs an Enemy of the State. George Bush also has an enemy of the state: terrorists. Hitler used the "threat" of Judaism to frighten the German people into being sumissive. Bush uses the threat of terrorism the same way the eternal war was used in Orwell's 1984. To keep the populace off balance, confused, and malleable.
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders.That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger." - Herman Goering, Hitler's deputy and legal heir, at the Nuremberg trials
2006-09-19 13:59:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by john_stolworthy 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Hitler did no longer start up out killing Jews from his first day in workplace. It took him a on a similar time as. yet shall we seem on the similarities between Bush and Hitler. the two have been elected/chosen, Bush with the aid of the final courtroom and Hitler while Hindenburg died. They the two had terrorist assaults on there united states of america. Bush 9/11 and Hitler the Reichstag's fire. the two skipped over warning of the drawing near assaults. the two blamed foreign places ideologues. the two made speeches good afterwords. interior weeks Bush had the Patriot Act and Hitler had his "Decree on the protection of human beings and State". the two had a 4 365 days sundown provision placed on them to get them handed. the two had protesters arrested or put in unfastened speech zones faraway from the placement the place they have been appearing. the two use the be conscious fatherland to describe the country. the two declare/claimed to be Christian. the two shaped a clean business enterprise to consolidate numerous self sustaining police, intelligence and border companies mutually. Bush have been given fatherland protection and Hitler have been given the substantial protection workplace. Bush has the secret provider as a countrywide Police rigidity and Hitler had the SchutzStaffel. yet introduced in marketplace and forged an alliance, and that they have got been given former executives of the country's greatest agencies into government positions. the two use government to empower companies and reward the society's richest persons, privatize lots of the commons, stifle dissent, strip human beings of constitutional rights, and create an phantasm of prosperity via continual and ever-increasing conflict. historic previous seems to be repeating! And earlier you call me a stupid liberal,i'm a liberal yet i've got studied worldwide conflict II all of my existence. i understand historic previous and that i understand what i'm speaking approximately.
2016-10-15 04:43:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If I remember history right.... Hitler created a reign of terror, Bush started a war on(or against) terror.
By the way... If Bush was anything like Hitler then he would have hacked into the internet system, pinpointed your exact location, and sent in a bunch of nazis to send you off to a concentration camp where you would probably die within the next two years. Then again, is that really such a bad thing?
2006-09-19 14:09:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Liv 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hon, Bush DID win the election(s), you're just having a hard time getting over it. I believe, too, that "some people" is you because you have a basic lack of knowledge as to what Hitler was and what he was about. I realize that that never stopped a liberal from opening his mouth and spewing. So, basically, what you're saying is it's a bad thing to wave a flag. Why don't you hijack a plane to Cuba where I'm sure you'll be welcomed with opened arms.
2006-09-19 13:52:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I have the link to this, but I am sure these Nazis already have all this information. http://history.acusd.edu/gen/WW2Timeline/Prelude03.html
In 1925, Hitler seized leadership of a reorganized and newly-legalized National Socialist German Workers' Party.
In 1929 Hitler led a political campaign against the Young Plan of reparations payments.
In the May 5 elections of 1932, Hindenburg defeated Hitler 53% to 37% for the presidency, but there was no majority in the Reichstag for any party; in the July31 elections the Nazis won 230 seats with 37% of the vote and became the largest German party, but dropped to 33% in the Nov. 6 elections; Dec. 1, Kurt von Schleicher replaced Franz von Papen as Chancellor but instability increased.
Hitler made Chancellor Jan. 30, 1933, with the help of von Papen, and sought revision of Versailles system by immediately beginning a rearmament program with the support of industrialists such as Alfred Hugenberg and Gustav Krupp (who by April agreed to remove Jewish workers from his factories), and a public works program announced at the Feb. 11 International Automobile and Motor-Cycle Exhibition in Berlin, to build autobahns with 600,000 workers and make a Volksauto for less than 1000 marks.
In the March 5, 1933 elections, the National Socialist German Workers' Party won 43.9% and 288 of 647 seats in the Reichstag.
The Malicious Practices Act of March 21, 1933, began the mass arrests of communists and socialists, the Dauchau concentration camp was set up March 22 in a former powder milk plant, the Enabling Act March 23 made Hitler dictator and eliminated other parties such as the pro-Catholic Zentrum, radical books were burned May 10.
On Sept. 27, 1933, the Nazis blamed communists for the Reichstag fire.
2006-09-19 13:48:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jenny_is_Hot 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
Nasty comparison. Hitler doesn't deserve one bit of defense. Do you recall all of the other war crimes, that Hitler was guilty of?? Do you recall all the innocent people that was sent to the gas chambers ? Do you recall the German submarines coming right up to the eastern coast of America ? Do you recall how innocent Germans were so happy to see our American solders coming to rid them of the Nazi ? Do you recall how the American Soldier help to rescue wounded German children and treated their wounds ? I could go on and on. There is not enough room to ask you if you recall. But one thing is for sure. Our President of the United States, need all the Citizens support in defending for what America stands for. So Please don't compare our President to Hitler. No Sir, it is not even close.
2006-09-19 13:43:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Norskeyenta 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Well, his approval ratings never flagged. And from my own experiences in Germany, I can tell you that the older Germans have a silent regard for Hitler. A little troubling to be sure...but it exists nonetheless.
Now that's popular....
2006-09-19 13:46:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by KERMIT M 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Right. That's why Bush will probably have to have yet another catastrophic terrorist attack staged, in order to gain more popularity. Then he can find a way to blame it on Iran, so he can bomb the daylights out of them.
2006-09-19 13:55:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by oceansoflight777 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You can't compare Hitler with Bush...Hitler was smart intelligent, a real leader, he took the country to a real war, no lies,and when saw all lost had the dignity to kill himself
2006-09-19 13:46:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by class4 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yes he actually was more popular. This goes to mr al gore. DO YOUR HW Hitler was a FACAIST who are RIGHT WING!
2006-09-19 20:07:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by trl_666 4
·
0⤊
0⤋