When Iranian President Ahmedinejad made a speech to the UN General Assembly today, the US diplomats made a point of leaving the room and not listening to his speech.
Do you think this was sensible? Shouldn't they have at least been diplomatic enough to listen to what he had to say?
2006-09-19 13:14:31 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
helllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll no!
2006-09-19 13:15:49 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Terrorists who were Muslim did 9/11>
All Muslims are terrorists>
Iranians are Muslim>
Iranians are terrorists>
Ahmedinejad is Iranian>
Ahmedinejad is terrorist.
This is called Guilt by Association and is one of the fundamental errors of logic.
2006-09-19 13:29:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
whether it was sensible or not , who cares! ahmadinajad and his terrorist regim are not exactly the most sensible kind of people, the Iranian president is a madman who will bring upon world war three between the muslims and the free world , the only positive thing about it is that even though it may be costly , at least pretty soon the world will be rid of all the terrorist muslims-- horay!!!!!
2006-09-20 17:24:46 · answer #3 · answered by joefox217 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
specific i think of Bush replaced into impressive to no longer debate Ahmedinejad. first of all of the guy comes off as a choir boy, 2d each and every assertion he makes is directed in direction of US or Israel. the guy helps terrorism. Bush did impressive to forget approximately him. A debate could purely make this guy extra ideal interior the middle east. The media could of ate this up and there replaced into no win for Pres. Bush.
2016-10-17 07:25:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It just shows how Honest this current White House is when it says war is always the last option...Bush and his backers are the most dangerously corrupt officials the World has ever seen.
2006-09-19 13:18:02 · answer #5 · answered by dstr 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Refusing to listen to him until he stops the uranium enrichment program is the closest thing to sanctions that the UN will ever do.
2006-09-19 14:21:35 · answer #6 · answered by Granny 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was childish and immature, and showed that the US has no real interest in pursuing peaceful or diplomatic solutions to the problem.
2006-09-19 13:17:57 · answer #7 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think both sides are acting childish. It's like two tween girls after a big fight in the schoolyard. They refuse to see each other and call each other names like ***** behind their backs. It's pathetic, really.
2006-09-19 13:18:01 · answer #8 · answered by FootballFan1012 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
oh for heavens sake. There have been many times that was done to us and you didnt even notice it. So why do you care? I think the UN is useless anyway.
2006-09-19 13:19:03 · answer #9 · answered by dhamca 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
He said nothing worth hearing. He never has, and he never will. Why he is even still alive is far beyond me.
2006-09-19 13:18:31 · answer #10 · answered by FiatJusticia 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, he is a racist, fascist who is one of the world's most outspoken proponent's of hate, violence, terror and religious division. Personally, I think we should take him out.
2006-09-19 13:17:40 · answer #11 · answered by mattapan26 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋