They appear to be wimpy and moderate. It seems fishy. It seems like someone wimpy and moderate like Gore or Kerry started up this organization. They are always emailing me with their weak messages and telling me to take part in some vigil. Bunch of chodes. I vote third party. Greens, Libertarian, Socialist, etc. Parties that actually have some backbone. Lieberman is a wimp. Oh, I forgot, he was even too weak for the Democrats. Snap!
2006-09-19 12:52:26 · 10 answers · asked by cannonball 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
IT'S A DEMOCRATIC PROPAGANDA MACHINE.
2006-09-19 12:54:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
You are not alone in your observations and conclusions.
MoveOn.org, AirAmerica and half the blogs and websites that people keep posting for the "proof" of their positions are right off the chart.
They are the rhetoric and rants of the extreme far left and far right radicals that assume we can't form our own opinions or know the difference between valid facts vs. some idiot's conspiracy theory.
Every difficult or complex problem or concern that faces our nation has numerous possible solutions - (immigration, the war on terror, etc) -and some of the proposed solutions will always be on both extreme ends of a common sense meter (and, unfortunately, these are the ones that seem to get the most press).
The best solution always seems to be at or near the middle - regardless of the administration's party affiliation.
2006-09-19 13:09:54 · answer #2 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
check it out and look at the facts, That would be a real change for a Republican. It has TV adds on major issues. Hint, it was not started by al Gore or democrats. The owners are public records, get the facts before you rant wildly. One of the worlds richest men is a major contributor. Bill Gates is also a contributor. Anyone who uses windows is a contributor, unless you stole your copy as most Republicans would.
2006-09-19 12:59:08 · answer #3 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
MoveOn is a political action committee.
From Wikipedia:
"Federal PACs are limited in the amount of money that they can contribute to other organizations:
* at most $5,000 per candidate per election. Elections such as primaries, general elections and special elections are counted separately.
* at most $15,000 per political party per year.
* at most $5,000 per PAC per year.
However, PACs are not limited to advertising spent on the support of their own issues."
Basically, a PAC is a way you can hide a hell of a lot of money that you want to use in a political campaign. MoveOn has no cap on how much they can spend on pro-DNC ads, which means they beat the $15,000/year cap.
Now think about it, advertising is how you get to burn most of the budget in a campaign.
This is not a DNC issue only. There are PACs all over the place, supporting every possible candidate you can think for. MoveOn is just visible because they are really good at what they do.
2006-09-19 12:58:09 · answer #4 · answered by veraperezp 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
so... trying to work with others is wimpy?
while you may not think you are democrat or republican, sounds like you have a lot in common with the current republican leadership.... no way but your way, facts be damned and who cares what others say or their point of view...
in other words... everyone is wrong sometimes and your attitude is extremely dangerous and nothing gets done when you have your attitude...
2006-09-19 12:59:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
well i wouldn't say that Liberman is a wimp . but I'm not either a Dem or republican . yes that site is just a bunch of moderate demarcates
2006-09-19 13:05:04 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you want to bypass back added in time to work out the craze of conservatives leaving the Democratic party for the Republican party. As you've observed, the Democrats via maximum of our historic past were the conservative party and the Republicans the liberal party, maximum precisely the Republicans talked about as themselves the modern party. H. Hoover changed into the most suitable modern Republican president. interior the 1932 elections, FDR campaigned hostile to Hoover labeling Hoover a socialist in each speech. for sure once in place of work, FDR and his guidelines were obviously socialistic. Many Democratic conservatives left the party throughout FDR's words such as John Nance his vice chairman for 2 words. Nance tried to oust FDR from the party in the course of the 1940 elections yet failed. FDR managed to discredit each conservative Democrat that hostile him. it truly is exciting to word that Eisenhower, a conservative who served below FDR throughout WWII, decide on to run for president below the Republican party. Eisenhower changed into the first conservative Republican president. Eisenhower's 2 words as president cemented the Republican party as conservatives. In 1964 at the same time as LBJ, a so talked about as conservative Texan, previous the civil rights act, the Dixiecrats of the south bailed out og the Democratic party and joined the Goldwater conservatives interior the Republican party. traditionally, FDR began the breakup of the conservative Democrats. LBJ merely finished the pastime.
2016-11-28 02:54:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Moveon.org exposes political injustices wherever it find them, regardless of party affiliation.
2006-09-19 13:01:12 · answer #8 · answered by kwahaddi 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
YES!!! MoveOn.org is also a commie front organization and Islamo-Fascist terrorist supporters.
2006-09-19 14:09:04 · answer #9 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes.
2006-09-19 12:55:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋