with Iran????I just wanted some thoughts on this.
2006-09-19 10:15:11 · 13 answers · asked by shirley e 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I don't think so. Despite Bush gnashing his teeth over the prospect, our military is in shambles from a readiness point of view. Invasion would be impossible given what has occurred in Iraq. Bombing of nuclear facilities probably wouldn't accomplish much since their nuclear facilities are widely decentralized and the most important parts are underground and deeply fortified. Aside from veiled threats, Bush doesn't have many options. Iran will be nuclear ten years from now. The ship has sailed.
2006-09-19 10:20:27 · answer #1 · answered by Whoops, is this your spleeen? 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think that the Iraq pullout will happen in March to December, 2009. We will have a president in there, hopefully democrat, that will 100% oppose the war, because by that time most americans will just about had it with the war and the president. So we got a good three more years of this by my thinking.
2006-09-19 11:03:56 · answer #2 · answered by baseb11 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's possible,but I figure there will be a process of sanctions first. Honestly, I think we should just rain down on his nuclear plants with missiles, and get it over with. The president of Iran has so much as told everyone he's not going to abide by the rules, so let's just get it over with now. In fact, Hiroshima doesn't sound bad for Iran.
2006-09-19 10:28:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well I agree we have been at war with Iran since Jimmy Carter's failure of a presidency and that we only recently have had victories in this war.
2006-09-19 10:50:29 · answer #4 · answered by Bawney 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If war is truly necessary I hope so. If Dems get elected, we'll look like the biggest ******* in the world because they won't take the fight to Iran. They will try appeasing them over and over again and asking the UN for guidance.
2006-09-19 10:24:00 · answer #5 · answered by Kelly T 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I have news for you, we were in a war since Jimmy Carter did not respond to Iran, it got a lot worse, in fact we were losing the war all through the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, the African embassies and the USS Cole. It wasn't until Bush that we began winning the war, so go look that up in your liberal dictionary.
2006-09-19 10:20:31 · answer #6 · answered by Colorado 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Depends on what Iran does!
2006-09-19 10:19:16 · answer #7 · answered by itsallover 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
properly, he's truly attempting to cajole us that it truly is an outstanding idea (to tackle Iran). My situation is what number of human beings will purchase his motives? i understand i do not. Martial regulation? i will avail my self of the Constitutional proper to undergo fingers then.
2016-11-28 02:31:59 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do...why not, he's a war hungry and money spending fool. It's all about power and "being the man!".
2006-09-19 10:26:21 · answer #9 · answered by HotInTX 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't think it will be that soon. Unfortunately, it will be during somebody else's administration so that Bush can say "it wasn't on my watch".
2006-09-19 10:19:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋