English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

deadly consequences? So here we go again. Bush. Iran seeking nuclear weapons. That Iran suspend her uranium enrichment. He implies that the U.S. is the one and only country that is deserving of nuclear weapons, He continues to do this, even given our reputation, of unilateral decisions that have wreaked havoc on so many innocent lives...

and so within this war on terror, seemingly extending to a war on collective sensiblities, on common sense, and on deadly US-led decisions, Bush moves in another direction.
This morning, Bush backed down a bit He warns Iran to "immediately begin negotiations on its nuclear program", further warning that "delays would bring consequences." He later directs his comments to the people of Iran, assuring that he is not waging war. He applauds them as a people, while praising their very rich culture and .remarkable past history.
The U.S. is not ready for Iran. Not yet.
Just a few more speeches....on freedom and democracy..
and then,
dejavu

2006-09-19 07:59:15 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

9 answers

1. Before the Iraq "liberation", the US public believed that Iraq had Nukes/WMD. (Polls: 80%)

2. Iraq said they did not have WMD, we said they are lying

3. We presented evidence that was false, the UN teams also said our evidence was false

Now,

1. Before the new IRAN "liberation", the US public believes that Iran has Nukes (Polls: 80%...again)

2. Iran says they do not have WMD, we say they are lying

3. We presented evidence that Iran had enriched uranium to 85%, the UN teams have said in a letter to congress that our evidence is wrong. Iran only enriched uranium to 3% good only for electricity.

What's the next step....dejavu? You go that right!

2006-09-19 08:39:17 · answer #1 · answered by Whatever 3 · 0 0

'He implies that the U.S. is the one and only country that is deserving of nuclear weapons'
Not really. As a signer of the Non-Nuclear Proliferation Agreement Iran has the obligation of suspending the uranium enrichment program. The western community is going as easy as possible to avoid giving islamist fundamentalist more excuses for violence and to keep China and Russia on their side.

'Just a few more speeches....on freedom and democracy... and then, dejavu'
I hope not! American forces were overstretched looking for Bin-Laden and fighting in Afghanistan when these group of 'geniuses' thought invading Iraq was a good idea. Now there is no chance of the US going to Iran unless there is true cooperation from NATO, Russia and China... sanctions will come first.

According to the international experts, for it is known about their facilities and the current stage of developing it would take about 10 years for Iran to develop an atomic weapon.

You know that old saying: 'Money walks...' well, Bush likes talking.

2006-09-19 08:21:07 · answer #2 · answered by Lumas 4 · 0 0

Deadly consequences. Implies... our unilateral decisions of havoc! Really?

I say let them develop all the nuclear materials they can! When they get POed at one of their "brothers" they can walk right next door and cut one lose!! In a few years the radiation MIGHT come over our way but we'll only get sick from it. I mean, really! Very few of us will actually die! Even fewer of us will really be affected in any way at all. The mall won't close! Bush wants to believe 'em. He wants to. He tells them to do something, then, hearing the cries of pain and injustice from Anytown, USA, he tempers what he says. Maybe he's trying to please, us. Maybe he knows what they'll do to each other. ?? Maybe he knows their past better than most. Maybe he's been reading up on them, and I don't mean the text books they gave us in school! Maybe some raw history. So, he backs down. He don't make 'em do nothin'! What's the problem now?

And BTW, Deja Vu once again ...

2006-09-19 08:36:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well here we are @ the Cross Roads of what could be a disaster but fortunatly we are not going to war with Iran we cant afford it and dont have enough man power to pull something like that off with out dragging out alot of old soldiers whom I am sure would love to go over there. I say let Iran have there nuke its not going to make any difference anyway there are plenty of ways to blow something up without a nuke. They say they would like to be part of the nuclear power era well I say let them have it who are we to say no to the rest of the world I wouldnt like it if we couldnt do the same so I say let them be.

2006-09-19 08:12:43 · answer #4 · answered by Giv-Me-An-Sir 2 · 0 0

ok Billy-boy i will bite. i'm nonetheless giggling at Joe. Had a bad journey in Atlanta I take it. As somebody from the Hamilton section, I shop on with all of this heavily. by way of fact the Coyotes are out, then the Thrashers are the group du jour. and not just to make Joe chuffed. a minimum of it would be a set already based interior the east so the impact to league alignment is minimum. undecided why they went to Atlanta back after the failure of the Flames yet, some people like annoying circumstances i assume. It won't ensue and Hamilton will on no account get a set. constantly the bridesmaid and on no account Jessica Simpson or something like that. that is an injustice that there is no NFL group in L.A. yet they have 2 hockey communities and a pair of basketball communities. I say i purchase the Cardinals and pass them to L.A. just to piss the folk in Phoenix off. LMAO - properly no longer incredibly. la desires a set yet i'm no longer able to think of of an NFL group with adequate subjects that they could be moved (perchance Buffalo) As for baseball, different than the Yankees and the purple Sox, have not especially lots another group moved a minimum of as quickly as? The Braves and A's have wheels on them curiously. There are fairly some below-served US industry interior the pro activities international. there is no communities in Alabama or Iowa or Mississippi. And what approximately Kansas. Kansas city is in Missouri (it incredibly is confusing to a Canadian permit me inform you). You caught your foot in it with the Oiler remark. That group is especially take care of now that Katz is in touch. He owns a chain of drug shops it incredibly is almost national in length and leagalized drug pushing is a rewarding enterprise (he's likewise a shopper of my enterprise). i'd want to assert that the two the U. S. and Canada are in truth produced from decent people. the two have their share of jerks and and a*holes. the indisputable fact that the U. S. is almost 10x the dimensions ofCanada, makes it appear like they have a greater share of them while quite i'm particular we the two have an identical share yet with a much bigger selection comes a greater quantity. Peace out people, the U. S. hasn't despatched an armed rigidity to attack Canada by way of fact the Fenian raids of 1865 and we kicked their asses and despatched them abode (it additionally inspired MacDonald and Cartier to actual form the rustic it incredibly is Canada at present).

2016-10-01 03:46:14 · answer #5 · answered by hobin 4 · 0 0

The US and its allies are hoping that a diplomatic solution can be accomplished for the cessation of weapons grade uranium enrichment by Iran.

2006-09-20 12:28:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

US is ready, but Americans are opposing Bush.

2006-09-19 08:03:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Something has to happen first in the USA first before we will do something..

2006-09-19 08:07:20 · answer #8 · answered by greenie 6 · 0 0

do you even know what dejavu means

2006-09-19 20:40:04 · answer #9 · answered by acid tongue 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers