get over it already. the perjuring traitorous military secret selling socialist is no longer relevant and he never was.
2006-09-19 07:54:18 · 33 answers · asked by S H I R A Z 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
steven j , Clinton never caught Bin Laden. lol
2006-09-19 08:02:35 · update #1
He was the liberal messiah sent to be sacrificed for the followers of the religion of liberalism. Instead of a cross he was crucified with oralsex.
Steve J. Contact me. I'm ready to pay you the money you won on the bet that I wouldn't waste my time on your links. I'll forward it to your welfare account.
2006-09-19 08:00:54 · answer #1 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Truthfully I never payed any attention to anything he did or didnt do until the sex scandel and thats when he got my attention and respect. Just because a man is president doesnt mean that automatically he becomes some kind of non-human with and not have normal human desires. I would of had less respect for him if he would of turned her down. People look at her as the victim I dont since she planned the whole thing before getting the job in fact that was her main purpose to get the job was to have some kind of sex with the president. The only victim was really CLinton since he only acted like any normal healthy male would when some young girl gets on her knees and gives him head , any normal man when getting head goes completly brainless. I really think its stupid how everyone expects for the presidents to be this shiny clean free of any type of errors in life person. I think for a person to know how to run a country right he or she must have experienced normal life and had lots of errors and learned from them thus preventing the chance of the same ones happening while in office. Having a prude in office is a big mistake along with being rich to begin with. About what you say he did I have no idea what he did or didnt do since I wasnt there and what is written in the newspapers and said on the news I only believe maybe about 30 % . You are told what the media wants you to be told. I tend to only believe what I see with my own eyes. I tend to go for the cold hard facts and not words written or spoken by someone I have no idea who they are. So sorry cant help you with why people still talk about him other than why I do and thats because I have to pat him on the back for being human.
2006-09-19 08:19:19 · answer #2 · answered by hersheynrey 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton is what is best in Democrats,
Spinless,
mindless not able to define is,
suck ups i.e. appeasement monkies more concenred about what France thinks that what their fellow Americans thin,
live in an alternative world altered by chemicals or drugs,
want eberything for nothing and in general make excuses for people that are in their party see Clinton, but would slaughter oppenents like Rush for have a drug problem, while if he was in their party they would want and swear treatment is the only option.
2006-09-20 03:47:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Stop bringing Clinton up if you don't want to hear about him!
Seriously I haven't heard so much about Clinton since visiting Y!A & listening to all the various groups bad mouth him. Of course I don't listen to any of the psuedoconservative talk show entertainers like Rush etc who are also obsessed by him!
What is the deal?
On the one hand, they whine about people still talking about him - but on the other they are the one that are putting him in the limelight again!
Geez!!!!
2006-09-19 15:32:37 · answer #4 · answered by carl l 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's because he was the last Democratic president, and a President, regardless. I'm abolutely certain that whenever the White House changes parties next, the Republicans will be unable to stop yammering about their last republican guy. Look how much of a fanfare was put up for Reagan when he died! I'm interested to know why you seem to think that Clinton never mattered. We did experience a much stronger, more consistent economy under him than the current administration, for one thing. Does this mean you agree with our current President whole-heartedly? Of course you can think whatever you want, I'm just curious to see if you can back up your remarks about Clinton with facts, or show empirically how Bush is different. (I'm guessing you probably can't)
2006-09-19 08:02:41 · answer #5 · answered by Ms. Lissa 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
The Clinton Initiative gets better ratings than George W. Bush
2006-09-19 07:57:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Because we are comparing Bush with him, just as you Conservatives do. Stop bashing him about Monica for a minute and realize something. the truth of the matter is that Clinton was much better. he caught and arrested the guy who attempted to bomb the WTC in 93. something you narrow-minded fools most likely didn't know. i bet $9999999 that you won't even look at the links because you are too afraid to be wrong.
2006-09-19 07:59:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
I'm sorry Mr.Syrah, but the Conservatives seem to dote on the topic of Clinton more often than we Democrats. Therefore, your question holds no real weight to it.
2006-09-19 10:59:50 · answer #8 · answered by The Man of Steel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Clinton's have taken lying to a much higher level than ever before, they have shown the Democratic party that all you have to do is lie, and make up slogans to be sucessful in politics. The Democratic party has been destroyed by Bill and Sillary and needs a complete overhaul if it is ever going to be a viable organization again.
2006-09-19 08:01:28 · answer #9 · answered by daydoom 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It's just nostalgia, the way Republicans used to talk about Reagan or Eisenhower long after they were out of office. Everyone likes to think back on better times.
2006-09-19 07:58:56 · answer #10 · answered by rollo_tomassi423 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I've noticed it's more about the conservatives bringing up Monica and Hillary bashing than democrats by FAR.
2006-09-19 07:57:26 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋