Here's my list (now take the groups and put them in your own order):
#1. Black (Most likely, especially since so many people seemed to want to support Colin Powell's bid for president- even though he decided not to go through with it.)
#2. Jewish (Likely, but I still think a black president will be 1st)
#3. Woman (A White woman though. Hillary Clinton seems to be getting a lot of love.)
#4. Asian (Unfortunately, I think the stereotype of Asian men-as meek- will hold them back from holding such an office.)
#5. Arab Christian (Even though they would share the majority faith of Americans, I don't find this very likely to happen for quite a while. Freaking stereotypes!)
#6. Muslim (We are so Islamophobic in this country that unfortunately I don't see this happening anytime soon. Although, it may be beneficial to us.)
Ps. I'd really appreciate it if you listed reasons along side your order of things. You don't have to, but if you do... I'll be your best friend! :o)
2006-09-19 07:49:07 · 14 answers · asked by MazR 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
"Neddie" you got to do better than that.
"Leogirl08" last time I checked there is one in office right now and always has been.
Why don't you all answer the question, instead of trying to just get 2 points. Do what the question asks of you. It's a serious question.
2006-09-19 07:54:46 · update #1
"ajsarabia" sorry about that. I completely forgot and left out the Hispanic/Latino possibilty... yes, I think that's very likely as well.
2006-09-19 07:57:58 · update #2
"Jeremy A": I 'just say no' actually. Shouldn't you be out burning crosses in a minority's lawn or something?
2006-09-19 08:02:29 · update #3
"femalegtr": It's not supposed to be a "racist" question. It's a real question and one that has a lot of relevance. I don't know why me asking why there hasn't been any minority groups (except a Catholic, if you want to count that as a "minority") in the Presidential office is racist. People's ignorant repsonses may be, but the question is not. Race is a big problem everywhere, especially in the U.S. and I don't think discussing it- the reasons behind, and the future of it- are racist by any means.
Ps. I never said I wanted Hillary Clinton in office. Just that, I think a woman is more likely because of the support she's getting- it's showing that people are getting more accepting of the idea of a woman president.
2006-09-19 08:13:01 · update #4
"femalegtr" by the way, that's why I stated "if they all had equal experience".
2006-09-19 08:14:31 · update #5
You wanted it to get deleted because you know it's true. I still got the points anyway, so suck it!
2006-09-19 14:16:09 · update #6
None of these have a chance. The only chance they have is in a stupid tv show of a crummy sci-fi novel. Stupid people like you were predicting a black or woman pres back in the 60's. They were on too much drugs. What are you on?
HA HA DUMMY THEY REMOVED YOUR ANSWER!!!
2006-09-19 07:59:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would tend to look at their other differences besides race and gender. For instance: Do they have a family? Have they ever been unemployed?
I think this is a seriously racist question. However, I do have an opinion.
I think we are going to have a Black president before we will have a woman president. Some men are too sexist to want to let a woman have the job - inspite all of the enlightening which has happenned over the years.
I do not want Hillary Clinton. I don't trust her to have my best interests in mind. (No matter what she says.)
I think we can come up with a well qualified person to run against her and win.
2006-09-19 15:05:49 · answer #2 · answered by femalegtrst 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Good question.. I would say a women, because from what I could tell, this country is ready for a woman to run this country... Considering there is a show about it, and there is a lot of publicity between hilary and condolisa ... I just hope our next president does a good job cleaning up Bush's mess...
2006-09-19 15:00:27 · answer #3 · answered by qbanita0113 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
This is what is wrong with you people. You go all around running off at the mouth spouting racist ideas and then your feelings get hurt when someone calls you on it.
If it discriminates against black or hispanic people it is RACIST.
If it discriminates against women is it SEXIST.
If it discriminates against white men it is called AFFIRMATIVE ACTION.
Grow up and quit blaming other people for your sorry lot in life.
2006-09-19 16:06:45 · answer #4 · answered by Han Shot First 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think both #1 and #3.
I fully support Condoleezza Rice for president and I very much hope she runs. The best part is that my support of her has nothing to do with either her race or gender. She is simply the best qualified for the job!
Condi '08!
2006-09-19 14:54:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
If it comes down to only those choices, I'll choose answer number "00" as in a shotgun loaded with double 00 and shoot myself in the head because the USA is a goner.
2006-09-19 16:03:59 · answer #6 · answered by Jerry R 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hopefully Miss Condolezza Rice. She would be really good. She proves that you can be a women of power and still be pretty feminine about it. So #'s 1&3.
2006-09-19 14:57:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
#1. Black (Most likely, especially since so many people seemed to want to support Colin Powell's bid for president- even though he decided not to go through with it.)
2006-09-19 14:53:13 · answer #8 · answered by jerry39 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Black
Woman
Jewish
Asian
Arab
Muslim
2006-09-19 15:00:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think Hillary will be our next president. But honetly, I don't think she'll be the first "female" president.
2006-09-19 14:53:04 · answer #10 · answered by jqdsilva 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋