Sorry, sports fans, but THIS is the real question.
2006-09-19 07:19:28 · 12 answers · asked by Walter Ridgeley 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
All of them. And if you're dumb enough to believe the US/British forces 'torture' techniques are 1/10th as bad as what our soldiers go through you're and idiot! Sleep deprivation, cold temps and loud music and 'speaking harshly' don't seem to compare to mutilations, beheadings and God knows what else those heathens do to our troops.
I will add that I believe we do use some more 'painful means of persuasion (although I don't know what, and DON'T want to know) it has been done forever by all forces--but I am quite certain our 'brutal' techniques would be considered mild when compared to that of an army of terrorists!
2006-09-19 07:32:34 · answer #1 · answered by Cherie 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
None. The US cannot seriously support a bill that does not allow the most basic rights of capture for people in this so called war of terror. If the bill is passed, there will be nothing left within the law to stop the CIA from brutalizing suspects, when you are being brutalized, you will say anything to make it stop, be it true or false.
Ask yourself the question, if someone was slapping you repeatedly around the face and neck with the "open hand" technique that leaves no lasting damage but hurts like hell, if you were forced to stand, naked, with a bag over your head in a cold room for hours at a time as music was blasted in to keep you awake for days at a time, would you not confess to anything? I bloody well would.
2006-09-19 15:13:59 · answer #2 · answered by fumanch00 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the torture you are referring to is blasting the Red Hot Chile Peppers and a cold room,all of them.
2006-09-19 14:24:28 · answer #3 · answered by bereal1 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How many americans rights do we need to take away in order to catch 5 or 6 terrorists?
2006-09-19 14:22:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Couldn't they just come up with some kind of chemical thing that will force people to tell the truth, instead of torturing them?
That'd be a great way to get them all!
2006-09-19 14:22:36 · answer #5 · answered by Michael R 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
AND you KNOW they are "guilty" because someone under torture says so? Maybe they will say anything under torture like: Walter Ridgely is part of our cell....
2006-09-19 14:26:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's ok to torture ALL of them! if it saves american lives, cut off fingers, gouge out eyeballs, literally beat the crap out of the towelhead scum!!
2006-09-19 14:23:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
its not ok to torture, just put the shoe on the other foot..
~natural~
2006-09-19 14:26:31 · answer #8 · answered by ~natural~ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All of them if necessary. If it could stop the death of the innocent they bomb, torture and injure, then as many as it takes.
2006-09-19 14:21:44 · answer #9 · answered by 75160 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The US doesn't condone torture so neither should they do it. My answer is none.
2006-09-19 14:21:12 · answer #10 · answered by Justsyd 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋