More troops sent by the Queen helped the American revolution cause, perhaps the increasing US presents in Iraq may eventually unit Iraq's rebellious citizens to do everything in their power to send us packing home. Do you have any historical example that contradict this or do you agree?
2006-09-19 06:11:27 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Specious reasoning? Perhaps Vietnam, Korea would be anther two fine examples and your examples?
2006-09-19 06:29:19 · update #1
Military Commanders and Democracy have never been a good combination just look at Thailand, or event oh yes Iraq.
2006-09-19 06:39:51 · update #2
Agree.
2006-09-19 06:19:21 · answer #1 · answered by coffeepleasenosugar 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Specious reasoning. Up to a point, more troops could likely help. But after that, you would just have soldiers standing around and getting in each other's way. I believe the term is "saturation" and the military commanders are well aware of that.
2006-09-19 13:16:24 · answer #2 · answered by Albannach 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If they really want Iraq to have democracy so much then why do then not work on giving Americans a real democracy?
2006-09-20 07:57:01 · answer #3 · answered by adobeprincess 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The US doesn't support democracy because it supports the Saudi Government, which is one of the most NON democratic nations. Even Iran gives its people more rights than Saudi Arabia.
2006-09-19 13:30:09 · answer #4 · answered by Lotus Phoenix 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't really understand your question, but here's what I believe:
Would you pound your kid to teach him not to be violent?
You cannot batter people into doing things your way, you must teach by example.
Democracy means letting people choose for themselves, doesn't it?
2006-09-19 14:59:12 · answer #5 · answered by The Gadfly 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they either become democrats, or we'll kill them all, sounds like muslim rhetoric to me
2006-09-20 03:53:08 · answer #6 · answered by acid tongue 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋