Aside from allowing small States to have a say in the election and preventing a regional leader from becoming President, the Electoral College was also created as a safeguard against the election of unsavory characters (such as you know who). Needless to say, it doesn't work anymore in that regard. I believe Jefferson was the first to invent the concept after speaking with John Adams. Basically Jefferson's concern was that "Everybody should be allowed to vote, but how can you expect a man that can't even write his name to make a thoughtful decision?" Hence, the electoral college was also created to counter "bad decisions". The College would then prevent the election of someone like a Hitler.
2006-09-19 06:34:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Shivers 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
That election was actually the 4th time that this incident has taken place. The previous three were 1824, 1876, and 1888.
Each state gets 1 electoral vote for each Senator (EVERY state has 2 and ONLY 2), but they also get 1 vote from each Congressman. That number varies from state to state based on population. Calfornia has a lot of people so they have 52 Congressmen, that plus the 2 Senators gives CA, 54 total votes. While Rhode Island has very few people, has only 1 Congressman and 2 Senators for a total of 3 votes. Washington DC also has 2 electoral votes. Which ever candidate wins the popular votes... gets ALL of the electoral votes, reguardless of margin of victory.
Take a look at the map in the link. It shows how many Electoral Votes each state has.
2006-09-19 06:30:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by tbayxxxv 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The electoral college was designed by our fore fathers to prevent large liberal population centers from controlling the presidency. This means that every vote counts because typically the person who is the electoral voter is required by law, in most states, to cast their votes for the person who won the popular vote in that state.
The electoral college has worked for over 230 years and was designed by Ben Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and the other brave souls who founded this country. They understood these issues back then and they still hold true today. Just because someone has the largest population center (NY, CA, MA, etc.) does not mean that they should control the entire country.
2006-09-19 07:13:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's not correct. After the votes of the state are tallied, the majority of the state via the electoral college votes for that winning party. The electoral college ensures that all states get represented in an election. This way we don't have only the populated states California, New York and Texas deciding all our elections. It's actually a very smart system.
2006-09-19 06:14:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The Electoral College provides the smaller states with a say.
When you vote it determines how the Electoral College eventually votes... If you don't like the way your state appropriates its votes then go to your state capital and lobby them to change it.
We normal people did elect Bush. It was just not a popular election. It never has been.
2006-09-19 06:15:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by C B 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
the unique purpose for the electoral college, in accordance to the founders, is to help guard the presidency in case there grew to become right into a demagogue working for the race. If there grew to become into somebody who grew to become into for sure risky to the country yet a approach or the different swayed "the mob" to vote for him, the factor of the electors interior the electoral college grew to become into to help guard the yank human beings from themselves with the aid of ignoring the familiar vote and fairly choosing the final candidate. human beings like Alexander Hamilton have been enormously careful of letting the human beings rule, and he even advocates the Electoral college in Federalist sixty 8, wherein he writes "and since the electors, chosen in each State, are to convey mutually and vote interior the State wherein they are chosen, this indifferent and divided subject will divulge them much less to heats and ferments, which may well be communicated from them to the human beings, than in the event that they have been all to be convened at one time, in one place." Hamilton grew to become into terrified of the means of the yank human beings being whipped right into a frenzy and making a nasty determination for President. All stable intentions aside, in spite of if, the electoral device now no longer extremely achieves that purpose as we've a party device, and people who chosen the electors are the events. They make certain which you do choose for the main non secular followers of the events, so in spite of if human beings passed off to vote for somebody very undesirable for the country -- say, somebody from a Fascist party -- the electors would be hardcore Fascists who will eagerly forged their vote for mentioned candidate. in spite of that, a lot of human beings, particularly those in smaller states, nevertheless assert that the electoral college is the only reason they are nevertheless appropriate in presidential races. with out it, applicants may well be lots greater possibly to concentration on the vast city centers the place the anybody is placed. no count if or no longer that's a appealing effect is outdoors the scope of this communicate.
2016-10-15 04:16:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by gaffke 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Electoral College prevents a purely regional candidate with a lot of votes in a few states to be president.
People have a voice in the electors, how they are appointed, and how they vote by recourse to their state legislators. In almost all states they are bound by law to vote for the winner in their state.
And if people don't like the law, they can amend the Constitution.
2006-09-19 06:13:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Don't vote show the Conservative bastards
It is the way it is
vote to change if you do not like it
Otherwise shut the F up and quit complaining
Work to change not whine about it
Get a backbone, put up or shut up
2006-09-19 06:18:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by buzzy360comecme 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ger 2/3 of all states to agrere with you then it is a done deal
2006-09-19 06:16:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Scott B 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Good Point. I wonder what would happen if we did away with the electoral
vote system. I bet it would change allot of things.
2006-09-19 06:19:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by breeze32461 2
·
0⤊
0⤋