Is it their weakness towards falling for superstition?
Is it peer pressure from loud reactionaries and warmongers?
Are they afraid if any non-conservatives actually say something,it might cut through all the hateful Right-Wing BS?
That's probably it.
If a conservative smears someone and impersonates them,that's
the moral goodness and light of the lard,er,lord.BUT if someone who is not a scornful reactionary says something a conservative doesnt want to hear,THEN smearing and denial is ok.
Where is the moral integrity,or is that just more hateful BS?
makes you think.
2006-09-19 05:33:36 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They're not blind to it. They embrace it! They love the cronyism of Bush and the law-dodging he does. They call it 'being tough'.
2006-09-19 05:37:47 · answer #1 · answered by Hate Boy! 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I don't see that conservatives are any more blind to dishonesty than liberals.
Liberals seem to have as many 'superstitions' as conservatives. Most of what you're saying seems based on 'superstition'.
Peer pressure?
Don't see that they're afraid of much, except being shut out of the political process again.
Impersonates?
Whasamatta? You can't stand it that somebody has a different view than yours? Now who's being hateful?
2006-09-19 12:40:35 · answer #2 · answered by r_moulton76 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It amazes me how each party follow says the other is the one who loves mudslinging. It amazes me how it never ends, oh thats right mudslinging is the campaign game now, Jerry Springer politics....might work , he was on the air for a while....No matter what party, the few ruin it for the many....All politicians are crooked, stuff money into there pockets while the hungry sit outside there window....All groups are guilty of it, no agenda is the perfect agenda.....compromise or the nation sinks......
2006-09-19 12:39:05 · answer #3 · answered by lost&confused 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Conservatives are very blind. I think I'm going blind too by looking at my lover Shirazz's big fat white butt. We don't need lights at our house because his butt glows in the dark. Guess we be saving some money on that electric bill.
2006-09-19 13:04:47 · answer #4 · answered by JS 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
They are "believers" and once they fixate on a leader, that's it for them. Like a duck being imprinted. Moral integrity means thumping a bible, falling down in ecstasy, opening their wallets and being pronounced "saved" by their smarmy preachers.
2006-09-19 13:51:25 · answer #5 · answered by TxSup 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Intergrity doesn't exist for them, I could give you hundreds of personal examples from my dealings with conservative nut-jobs regarding, deceit, cowardice, racism, homophopia, sexism, etc. How does Condi stay the course with that monkey?, simple she has no intergrity. Republicans like Powell and McCain are people I disagree with on many issues but Respect for their stance against this, the most criminal of all presidential administrations.
2006-09-19 12:39:11 · answer #6 · answered by Dr.Feelgood 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Jim, buddy, I love ya. Everytime I read a post like yours, I feel a hell of a lot better about November. Chances of getting a conservative back in the White House in 08 look rosy, too.
Keep up the good work, buddy!
2006-09-19 12:37:54 · answer #7 · answered by Simon Templar 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I am only open to the truth. When I am presented with facts and not some goofy blog or accusal with no back up evidence I do tend to not give it too much credence. I think liberals would be much happier and sleep better at night if they followed the same reasoning.
2006-09-19 12:38:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
As you can see by the brilliance of Ace's and John's responses, a few of them are not too clever.
2006-09-19 12:37:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Just take the idiot to task. I'd recomend not lumping all neocons in the same group as that moron.
2006-09-19 12:44:58 · answer #10 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋