English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-19 04:24:48 · 13 answers · asked by Super Shiraz 3 in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

mean spirited

2006-09-20 09:34:17 · answer #1 · answered by S H I R A Z 3 · 0 0

I assume you can give evidence to support this claim, rather than a blanket statement meant to inflame.

John Wilkes Booth never struck me as liberal or a democrat.

I assume that you are going to label anarchists (Czolgosz), the mentally ill (Guiteau) and communists (Oswald) as part of the liberal spectrum as well.

2006-09-19 04:33:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

because there in office after republican attempts to take over the country and they figure kill the leader to set an exaple to the rest what is in store for those who investigate or try to expose them .
wait what about reagan oh yea he didn't die he just turned a lind eye and he knew how to deal with terrorist this administration would be better off if it would of followed reagans example instead of getting hell bent on war

2006-09-19 04:32:10 · answer #3 · answered by matthew_yelle 2 · 0 0

Communism (from Latin: communis = "trouble-free") is a relatives of financial and political recommendations and social strikes touching directly to the business enterprise of an egalitarian, classless, or stateless society in line with trouble-free possession and administration of the means of production and assets many times, to boot because of the fact the call given to a minimum of one among those society Nazism, formally in German as national Socialism refers back to the ideology and practices of the national Socialist German workers’ party or NSDAP below Adolf Hitler, and the guidelines accompanied with the aid of the dictatorial government of Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1945. Nazism is often seen with the aid of scholars to be a variety of fascism Liberalism is a wide classification of political philosophies that considers guy or woman liberty to be the main mandatory political purpose. Liberalism emphasizes guy or woman rights and equality of threat. enable's attempt to maintain the definitions so as. with a bit of luck, you will understand that your chilly good judgment want yet another perspective.

2016-10-15 04:11:34 · answer #4 · answered by dopico 4 · 0 0

because conservative republicans that are very strong in their views tend to appear to be oppressive and this is sometimes misinterpreted by radicals as taking their freedoms away or even tyranny. and that generally brings out the worse in radicals and not democrats and BTW who knows who really is behind past assassination attempts

2006-09-19 04:34:09 · answer #5 · answered by wiz of ia 2 · 0 0

I have to disagree with you. Lee Harvey Oswald was a communist. Back then there was no affiliation with the democrats.

2006-09-19 04:33:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Nope,liar.

2006-09-19 04:26:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They aren't! What is the basis of your question? Sadly, you appear to be absolutely misinformed. Unfortunately, you are far from being alone.

2006-09-19 04:34:12 · answer #8 · answered by lr_trotter 2 · 0 0

Why was brainwashing SO effective in YOU?

Genetics?
Diet?
Neural defect?
What?

2006-09-19 04:44:48 · answer #9 · answered by tat2me1960 3 · 0 0

Like Lincoln?....




IDIOT

2006-09-19 04:30:16 · answer #10 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers